期刊文献+

创业风险决策框架效应特征研究 被引量:12

THE STUDY OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OF ENTREPRENEURIAL RISKY DECISION-MAKING
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以创业风险决策为背景,以从事管理类工作的白领员工为被试,探讨了框架效应的表现特征。结果表明随着损益值的增加人们倾向保守,而随着概率水平的增加而偏好冒险,创业倾向高的个体更倾向冒险。框架效应并不出现在所有输赢描述决策情境中,它只出现在缺乏主导社会线索的模糊情况下。 The structure of risky decision-making included payoff,probability and other social cues.Risky choice framing effect does not appear in any positive and negative framing risky decision-making scenario,and it is influenced by decision structure and only appears in ambiguous condition.We studied the characteristics of the entrepreneurial risky decision-making.The study designed two entrepreneurial scenarios,so as to testify the hypotheses repeatedly.The sample was based on administrative-kind job white collar.In order to prevent the contamination of participants,the study was divided into two parts.Experiment 1 was a 2(frame:win vs.lose) ×(payoff:high,middle and low) design,and experiment 2 was designed as 2(frame:win vs.lose) ×2(probability:10% and 50%).The results showed that,people took more certain choices as the payoffs increased,and as the probability increased people were more prone to take the risky choice.Individuals with high entrepreneurial intention were prone to take more risks.
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 2010年第2期106-112,共7页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 国家自然科学基金70902056项目 教育部人文社科09YJCZH087青年项目 苏州大学"211工程"三期重点项目的资助
关键词 框架效应 创业风险决策 决策任务结构 社会线索 Framing effect entrepreneurial decision-making the structure of risky decision-making social cue.
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 1981, 211:453-458.
  • 2Levin I P, Schneider S L, Gaeth G J. All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1998, 76 (2) : 149-188.
  • 3Kahneman D, Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 1984, 39, 341-350.
  • 4McNeil B J, Pauker S G, Sox H C, et al. On the elicitation of references for ahemative therapies. New England Journal of Medicine, 1982, 306:1259-1262.
  • 5Paese P W, Bieser M, Tubbs M E. Framing effects and choice shifts in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1993, 56 (1) : 149-165.
  • 6Kuhberger A, Schulte-Mecklenbeck M, Perner J. Framing decisions: Hypothetical and real. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2002, 89 (2) : 1162-1175.
  • 7Mandel D R. Gain-loss iraming and choice: Separating outcome formulations from descriptor fol~nulations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2001, 85 (1) : 56-76.
  • 8Wang X T. Framing effects: Dynamics and task domains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996: 68 (2) : 145-157.
  • 9Levin I P, Gaeth G J, Schreiber J, et al. A new look at framing effects: distribution of effect sizes, individual differences, and independence of types of effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2002, 88 (1) : 411-429.
  • 10Ktihberger A, Schulte-Mecklenbeck M, Pemer J. The effects of framing, reflection, probability, and payoff on risk preference in choice tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1999, 78 (3) : 204-231.

二级参考文献6

  • 1阿玛尔 毕海德.创业精神[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002..
  • 2杰弗里 蒂蒙斯 周伟民译.创业者[M].北京:华夏出版社,2002..
  • 3Krueger NF, Deborah J, Brazea V. Entrepreneurship potential and potential entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and practice, 1994,183 : 91 - 104.
  • 4Shaver KG, Scott LR. Person, Process, Choice: The Psychology of New Venture CreationJ, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Winter,1991:23-45.
  • 5Cromie S. Motivations of Aspiring Male and Female Entrepreneurs. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 1988, (4) :251 - 261.
  • 6Aiginger K, Tichy G. Small Firms and the Merger Mania. Small Business Economics, 1991, (3) : 83 - 102.

共引文献218

同被引文献146

二级引证文献238

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部