期刊文献+

第三次方法论运动——混合方法研究60年演变历程探析 被引量:26

The Third Methodology Movement:Probe and Analysis of the 60 years' Development of Mixed Approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 混合方法研究作为继定量研究、定性研究后的第三种教育研究范式,是以实用主义为基础,以研究问题为核心的多元化交叉研究方法。然而,由于不了解混合方法研究的发展历程,尤其是其产生的哲学基础和独有的研究策略,教育界对此方法使用极少或误用,认为它仅是定量和定性两种研究方法的简单混合。但是,混合方法研究60年发展历程的研究表明并非如此。20世纪50年代实证主义与建构主义之争产生了混合方法研究,20世纪60年代后实用主义哲学基础确立奠定其理论根基,20世纪80年代后研究步骤与策略的突破,最终迎来教育研究的第三次方法论运动。 As the third methodology after qualitative and quantitative approaches,the mixed approach is a cross-over study with pragmatism as its basis and research problems as its core.However,due to little understanding of the development process of mixed approach,especially its philosophical foundation for its emergence and its unique research strategy,educational researchers seldom use or misuse this approach and consider it only as the simple mixture of qualitative and quantitative approaches.However,the idea has been proved wrong by the research into the 60 years' development of mixed approach.Mixed approach derived from the dispute between positivism and constructivism in 1950s.Pragmatism became its philosophical basis after 1960s,which established its theoretical foundation.With the breakthrough in research procedure and strategy after 1980s,the third methodology movement of educational research finally took place.
作者 尤莉
出处 《教育学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期31-34,65,共5页 Journal of Educational Studies
关键词 混合方法研究 定量研究 定性研究 mixed approach quantitative approaches qualitative approaches
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献88

  • 1李勇杰.关于订立保险合同如实告知的若干思考[J].社会科学家,2004,19(4):88-90. 被引量:2
  • 2肖强,徐静.论我国保险法上的如实告知义务[J].华北电力大学学报(社会科学版),2004(4):45-47. 被引量:6
  • 3田虎伟.混和方法研究——美国教育研究方法的一种新范式[J].比较教育研究,2007,28(1):12-17. 被引量:36
  • 4Viadero, Debra.Mixed Methods'Research Examined Researchers See Pros and Cons of Mixed Methods'Studies.Education Week. 1-26,2005:20.
  • 5Johnson R B & Onwuegbuzie A J. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. [J]Educational Researcher, 2004, Vol.33 (7): 12-26.
  • 6约翰·W·克雷斯威尔著.崔延强译.研究设计与写作指导:定性、定量与混合方法研究的路径[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社.2007:168-171.
  • 7Burke Johnson, Larry Christensen. Educational research quantities, qualitative and mixed approaches [M]. USA:merrill. 2003:422.
  • 8Thomas N Kluwin, Martin Noretsky. A Mixed-methods study of teachers of the deaf learning to integrate computers into their teaching. [J].American annals of the deaf volume 2005,(4): 150.
  • 9Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Huang, T. I. ( 1999 ). Investigating classroom environments in Taiwan and Australia with multiple research methods. Journal of Educational Research, 93 ( 1 ), 48 - 62.
  • 10Beebe, J. (2001). Rapid assessment process: An introduction. Walnut Creek, CA : AltaMira.

共引文献90

同被引文献359

引证文献26

二级引证文献184

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部