期刊文献+

美国学校教育反思:世界主义和社会排斥的视角 被引量:7

Reflection on American Schooling:A Perspective from Cosmopolitanisms and Social Exclusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 长期以来,在美国学校教育中高扬的"世界主义"(cosmopolitanism)原则,即超越传统民族国家忠诚归属界限,带有普世价值的全球公民意识,被认为是推动社会和个人进步的重要思想,进入学校课程系统,贯穿于教学实践的各个环节。理性与合理性精神、时间概念的转变和进步主义思想的推动,使得世界主义在美国公立学校教育中长久不衰。它以改造儿童的方式推动社会变革,对人文学科,特别是教育学、心理学产生了深刻影响;同时,世界主义又是一个主张包容、却推行社会排斥的系统,主要体现在:它通过问题解决、赋权原则、自由解放、言论开放和选择权利等手段,引导儿童的成长;但又对学校教育中的学生进行分类,以换喻、分类等方式,塑造不同类型的学生。终身学习概念的提倡和为了"一切儿童"的口号,都反映了其中蕴含的比较思维方式在追求平等同时,又在制造新的不平等,造成抑斥的状态。体现了世界主义原则通过创塑儿童来改造社会的双重特征。 Cosmopolitanism,as the principle as world global citizen whose allegiance transcends the nation to express universal values of humanity at mass schooling in US,had been regarded as the vital thinking to produce both social and individual progress and work their ways into the curriculum and practices of pedagogy.The spirit of reason and rationality,changes in the conception of time and the ideas of progress deeply influenced the human sciences,particularly on education and psychology which embodied on the making society through remaking the child.Meanwhile,as a system of inclusion and exclusion,the cosmopolitanism fabricated human kinds and changed through problem-solving,empowerment,emancipation,freedom,and liberty,as well as the ways of fabricating the human kinds,such as metonym and classifications of youth.The advocation of lifelong learner and for "all children" mirrors the comparative style of thought in the cosmopolitanism is making into equality and reinscribing the inequality in the process of abjection.It reflects that the principles of cosmopolitanism about planning society by making children and as embodying double gestures.
出处 《教育学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期74-84,121,共12页 Journal of Educational Studies
关键词 世界主义 理性与合理性 社会排斥 cosmopolitanisms reason and rationality exclusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Counts, G. S. Dare the school build a new social order? [M]// L. Dennis & W. Eaton (Eds.), William George S. Counts.. Educator for a new age. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1932/1980.
  • 2Rancifire, J. The philosopher and his poor (J. Drury, C. Oster & A. Parker, Trans. )[M]. Durham, NC.. Duke University, 1983/2004.
  • 3Ranciere, J. Hatred of democracy [M]. (S. Cororan, Trans.). London: Verso,2006.
  • 4Foucault, M. Discipline and punish : The birth of the prison[M. New York: Vintage,1979.
  • 5Foucault, M. Governmentality. Ideology and Consciousness, 1979,6:5-22.
  • 6Popkewitz, T. S. Cosmopolitanism and the age of school reform: Science, education, and making society by making the child[M]. New York: Routledge,2008.
  • 7Cruikshank, B. The will to empower: Democratic citizens and the other subjects[M]. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, 1999 : 97.
  • 8Wiebe, R. H. Self-rule: A cultural history of American democracy [M]. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1995 : 186.
  • 9Hultqvist, K. The future is already here-as it always has been: The new teacher subject, the pupil, and the tech nologies of the soul. In T. S. Popkewitz, K. Petersson, U. Olsson & J. Kowalczyk (Eds.), "The future is not what it appears to be": Pedagogy, genealogy, and political epistemology. In honor and in memory of Kenneth Hultqvist. Stockholm, Sweden: HLS F6rlag, 2006:20-61.
  • 10Qi, J. A history of the present on Chinese intellectuals: Confucianism and pragmatism. In T. S. Popkewitz (Ed.), Inventing the modern self and John Dewey: Modernities and the traveling of pragmatism in education [M]. New York: PalgraveMacMillan,2005:255-278.

同被引文献83

引证文献7

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部