期刊文献+

后路椎间单纯植骨融合与椎间融合器融合治疗腰椎滑脱症疗效比较 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较后路椎间单纯植骨融合与椎间融合器融合治疗腰椎滑脱症的效果。方法对125例腰椎滑脱患者分别采用后路单纯植骨融合(植骨组,n=59)与椎间融合器(融合组,n=66)融合通过3D-CT比较两种植骨融合率及症状改善情况。结果通过3D-CT比较两种植骨融合差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),JOA评价远期疗效肯定,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论后路椎间单纯植骨融合与椎间融合器融合治疗腰椎滑脱症疗效相近,植骨方法的不同对椎间骨性融合成功与否关系极为密切。采用自体椎板、棘突植骨减少了并发症,提高了融合率,节省了医疗费用。
出处 《河北医药》 CAS 2010年第14期1872-1874,共3页 Hebei Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Mountain AJC,Kent AW.Spinal fusion:a ten year analysis from the serviceman's perspective.J Bone Joint Surg(Br),2003,85:131.
  • 2Meyerding HW.Spondylolisthesis.Surg Gynecol Obste,1932,54:371-377.
  • 3Brantigan JW,Steffee AD,lewis ML,et al.Lumbar interboby fusion using the Brantigan I/F cage for posterior lumbar inerboby fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system:two-year results froma Food and Drug Administration investional device exemption clinical trial.Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2000,25:1437-1446.
  • 4Satomi K,Hirabayashi K,Joyama Y,et al.A clinical study of degenerative shpndylisthesis.Radiographic analysis and choice of treatmeng.Spine,1992,17:1329.
  • 5Madan S,Boeree NR.Outcome of pasterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis.Spine,2002,27:1536-1542.
  • 6陈亮,唐天驷,杨惠林,邱勇,徐杰,蒋兴良,马仁治.后路BAK椎间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症的并发症分析[J].中华骨科杂志,2002,22(6):337-339. 被引量:86
  • 7Okuyama K,Abe E,Suzuki T,et al.Influence of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation:a study of pedicle screw fixation a-ugmenting posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients.Spine,2001,26:402-407.
  • 8Greiner-Perth R,Boehm H,Allam Y,et al.Reoperation rate afterinstrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion:a report on 1680 cases.Spine,2004,29:2516-2520.
  • 9Lidar,Z,Beaumont A,Lifshutz J,et al.Cliical and radiological relationship between posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterolateral lumbar fusion.Surg Neurol,2005,64:303-308.
  • 10Santos ER,Goss DG,Morcom RK,et al.Radiologic assessment ofinterbody fusing carbon fiber cages.Spine(Phila pa1976),2003,28:997-1001.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Lin PM. Posterior lumbar interbodv fusion technique,compli-cations and pitfalls[J].Clin Orthop,1985,193 :90-102.
  • 2Verlooy J, De Smedt K,Selosse P.Failme of a modified poste-rior lumbar interbody fusion technique to produce adequate pain relief in isthmie spondylolytie grade 1 spondylolisthesis patients[J].Spine, 1993,18(11) : 1491-1495.
  • 3Suk S,Lee CK,Kim WJ,et al. Adding posterior lumbar inter-bodv fusion to pediele screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression in spondylolytic spnndylolisthesis [J].Spine, 1997,22 (2) : 210-220.
  • 4Schlegel KF,Pon A,Biomechanics of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in spondylolisthesis[J].Clin Orthop, 1985,193:115-119.
  • 5Madan S, Boeree NR.Outcome of posterior interbodv fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spond?,lolytie spondylolisthesis[J].Spine, 2002,27 ( 14 ) : 1536-1542.
  • 6Nork SE,Hu SS,Workrnan KI,et al. Patient outcome after de-compression and instrumented posterior spinal Iusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis[J].Spine. 1999,24(6) :561-569.
  • 7Kim NH,Lee JW.Anterior interbody Iusion versus posterolater-al fusion with transpedicular fixation for isthmic, spondylnlis-thesis in adults[J].Spine. 1999,24(8) :812-817.
  • 8Booth KC,Bridwell KH,Eisenberg BA,et al. Mininmm 5-year results of degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decnm-pression and instrumented posterior fusion [J].Spine, 1999,24(16) : 1721-1727.
  • 9赵波,姜延洲,杨传铎,吴奋起,李端明.腰椎再手术中螺纹融合器的应用[J].中华骨科杂志,1999,19(4):250-251. 被引量:4
  • 10吴文华,圆尾宗司.后路椎体间植入物固定植骨融合治疗腰椎滑脱症[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,1999,9(4):184-187. 被引量:35

共引文献213

同被引文献35

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部