期刊文献+

《蝴蝶君》中全景敞视监狱意象 被引量:6

Reading the Image of Panopticon in M.Butterfly
原文传递
导出
摘要 《蝴蝶君》是对东西方话语权力关系的一次颠覆。西方通过创设一套话语符号系统和机制建构了东方,在这种"全景敞视监狱"式话语监视下,话语的所指不自觉地将这种压制或权力关系铭刻在自己身上,成为廉价话语权力的受害者。但辨证和历史地看,这种话语符号系统是一把双刃剑。一方面,西方世界的少数族裔以及广大非西方在西方强势的话语中失语和失去根性;另一方面处于权力中心的西方白人世界同样受到该体系的监视和束缚,从而形成话语的内部殖民并造成自身权力的被放逐,《蝴蝶君》即是后一种情况的代表性展现。 M. Butterfly subverts the traditional opposition of West and East that continues to structure the Western gaze. The novel demonstrates that Western stereotypes of the East indicate the creation of the subject within discourse. The identification with those stereotypes echoes the way that Foucault theorizes the internalization of power. Ac- cording to Foucault, the panoptic society works by having people believe they are being gazed and thus police themselves. History shows that this panoptical gaze is bi-directional. It might be deployed to make the person who is gazed docile and voiceless. But it also subjects the person who gazes to forces of discipline and control. M. Butterfly, for exam- ple, is an illustration of what some have called endo-colonialism, in which the one-wholooks becomes the one-who-is-looked-at.
作者 唐友东
机构地区 上海外国语大学
出处 《当代外国文学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期106-112,共7页 Contemporary Foreign Literature
关键词 《蝴蝶君》 全景敞视监狱 内部殖民 颠覆 M. Butterfly, panopticon, endo-colonialism, subversion
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1杰夫·丹纳赫等.《理解福柯》,刘瑾译,天津:百花文艺出版社,2002年.
  • 2迈克·福柯.《规训与惩罚》,刘北威等译,上海:三联书店,2003年.
  • 3Hwang,David Henry.M.Butterfly.London:Penguin Group,1989.
  • 4Hwang,David Henry."Evolving A Muhicultural Tradition."MELUS3(1990):16-19.
  • 5Juan,E.San Jr."Symbolic Violence and The Fetishism of The Sublime:A Metacommentary on David Hwang's M.Butterfly."Journal of International Studies 1(2002):33-46.
  • 6Kerr,Douglas."David Henry Hwang and The Revenge of Madame Butterfly."Asian Voices in English.Eds.Mimi Chan and Roy Harris.Hong Kong:Hong Kong UP,1991.119-30.
  • 7Kondo,Dorinne K."M.Butterfly:Orientalism,Gender,and A Critique of Essentialist Identity."Cultural Critique16(1990):15-17.
  • 8J.G·梅基奥.《福柯》,韩阳红译,北京:昆仑出版社,1999年.
  • 9凯特·米利特.《性政治》[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2000.
  • 10Moy,James S.Marginal Sights:Staging The Chinese in American.Iowa:U of Iowa P.1993.

二级参考文献19

  • 1包亚明.严锋译.《权力的眼睛——福柯访谈录》[M].上海人民出版社,1997.第30页.
  • 2J.丹纳赫等著.刘瑾译.《理解福柯》[M].百花文艺出版社,2002.第59页.
  • 3福柯.《权力/知识》[A].莫伟民.《主体的命运——福柯哲学思想研究》[C].上海三联书店,1996.第213页.
  • 4麦尔维尔著.周珏良译.《比利·巴德》[M].外语教学和研究出版社,1994.第435页.
  • 5.《福柯思想肖像》[M].,.第282页.
  • 6第28.《访谈录》[M].,.159,157页.
  • 7.《访谈录》[M].,.第152页.
  • 8麦魁尔.韩阳红译.《福柯》[M].昆仑出版社,1999.第60-61页.
  • 9Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish : the Birth of the Prison (New York: Vintage Books, 1995), p.5.
  • 10Discipline and Punish, pp. 89 - 90.

同被引文献38

  • 1陆薇.模拟、含混与杂糅——从《蝴蝶夫人》到《蝴蝶君》的后殖民解读[J].外国文学,2004(4):86-91. 被引量:40
  • 2袁素华.试论伍尔夫的“雌雄同体”观[J].外国文学评论,2007(1):90-95. 被引量:28
  • 3黄哲伦.蝴蝶君[M].张生,译.上海.上海译文出版社,2010.
  • 4西格蒙德·弗洛伊德.精神分析纲要[M].合肥:安徽文艺出版社,1987.
  • 5Connell, R. W. Gender [M]. Cambridge: Polity, 2002.
  • 6Connell, R. W. Masculinities, 2rid ed [M]. Berkeley, CA: U of California P, 2005.
  • 7Krasner, David. American Drama 1945-2000: An Introduction[M]. Malden, MA: Blaekwell, 2006.
  • 8Michael S. Kimmel. "Masculinity as Homophobia: Fear, Shame, and Silence in the Construction of Gender Identity" [A]. In Harry Brod and Michael Kaufman, eds. Theorizing Masculinities[C]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994. 119-141.
  • 9Moy, James S. "David Henry Hwang's M. Butterfly and Philip Kan Gotanda's Yankee Dawg You Die: Repositioning Chinese-American Marginality on the American Stage" [J]. Theatre Journal, 1993 (1) : 51-63.
  • 10雷基·伊利卡,乔赛普·贾科萨.蝴蝶夫人[M].人民音乐出版社,1982.

引证文献6

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部