期刊文献+

氯吡格雷抑制冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病患者血小板受体活化的特征 被引量:5

Activating profile of platelet receptors in patients with coronary disease after clopidogrel intake
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病患者服用氯吡格雷后血小板受体抑制与总活性短期改变的特征.方法 选择冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病患者32例,在服用100 mg/d阿司匹林的同时,分别在服用氯吡格雷前、300 mg负荷剂量后10 h和36 h(维持剂量75 mg)分3次采血检测.用AA和ADP作为诱导剂测定血小板聚集率,使用血栓弹力图仪配套试剂盒中的高岭土(Kaolin)试剂、AA、ADP和ActivatorF((R)) 检测并计算血小板INH;在FACSCalibur流式细胞仪上检测血小板活化标志物CD62p和VASP磷酸化水平(以PRI表示),分别了解血小板分泌活性和P2Y12受体被抑制的情况.比较各指标在服药前后的动态变化趋势,并评价其在反映血小板受体活化功能水平的价值.结果 ADP诱导的血小板INH在服药前为(11.5±9.3)%,服药后10 h升至(42.5±29.1)%,与服药前比较差异有统计学意义(t=3.155,P〈0.05),服药后36 h降至(20.4±13.1)%,与服药前比较差异无统计学意义(t=2.078,P〉0.05);由AA诱导的血小板INH服药前为(56.6±36.6)%,服药后10 h升至(83.0±27.3)%,与服药前比较差异无统计学意义(t=2.086,P〉0.05),服药后36 h升至(85.4±20.8)%,与服药前比较差异无统计学意义(t=1.888,P〉0.05);表明300 mg负荷剂量氯吡格雷对ADP诱导作用的抑制在36 h内未能稳定.由ADP诱导的血小板聚集率在服药前为(53.7±14.1)%,服药后10 h降至(49.2+22.8)%,与服药前比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.656,P〉0.05),服药后36 h降至(40.7±12.8)%,与服药前比较差异有统计学意义(t=2.418,P〈0.05);由AA诱导的血小板聚集率在服药前为(34.3±18.1)%,服药后10 h降至(17.4±13.1)%,与服药前比较差异有统计学意义(t=3.134,P〈0.05),服药后36 h降至(14.6±5.1)%,与服药前比较差异有统计学意义(t=2.532,P〈0.05).PRI在服药前为(78.6±22.3)%,服药后10 h降至(70.7±9.4)%,与服药前比较差异无统计学意义(t=1.194,P〉0.05),服药后36 h降至(59.6±28.0)%,与服药前比较差异有统计学意义(t=1.930,P〈0.05),说明氯吡格雷在36 h内尚未对ADP受体形成有力的抑制效果.CD62p在服药前为(7.5±1.4)%,服药后10 h降至(4.2±1.1)%,与服药前比较差异有统计学意义(t=18.027,P〈0.05),服药后36 h降至(4.3±0.2)%,与服药前比较差异无统计学意义(t=2.908,P〉0.05).CD62p反映的分泌活性所受抑制比较明显.相比而言,环氧化酶-1途径所受的抑制更为显著,而P2Y12受体所受抑制却因方法差异而不尽相同.结论 从诱导的血小板活化在氯吡格雷和阿司匹林联合抑制下显著减低,ADP受体直到服用负荷剂量氯吡格雷后36 h才出现显著抑制.全血中血小板功能反映了血小板与其他成分交互作用下的总活性,10 h内效果不明显. Objective To study the characteristic of inhibition on platelet P2Y12 and short-term change after clopidogrel intake in patients with cardiovascular disease. Methods Thirty-two patients with cardiovascular disease were enrolled. Samples at baseline, 10 h and 36 h after 300 mg loading dose and 75 mg/d maintenance dose of clopidogrel with 100 mg/d Aspirin intake were measured respectively. Platelet aggregation (PAgT) was measured on thromboelastograph(TEG) induced by ADP/AA. INH was detected and calculated activated by Kaolin, AA, ADP and Activator((R)) in the TEG reagent. CD62p and VASP phosphorylation (PRI), platelet activation markers were tested with FACSCalibur Flow Cytometry, and platelet secretion activity and suppression of P2Y12 receptor were detected respectively. The changes of indicators were compared before and after clopidogrel intake, and evaluate their function in platelet receptor activation. Results INHADP at baseline was (11.5 ±9.3)%, and increased to (42.5 ±29.1)% statistically (t =3.155, P〈0.05) after taking the P2Y12 at 10 h, but decreased to (20.4±13.1)% at 36 h, non-statistical to baseline (t = 2.078, P 〉 0. 05) , INHAA increases from baseline level (56. 6 ± 36. 6) % to (83.0 ±27. 3)% at 10h(t=2.086,P〉0.05) and (85. 4 ±20. 8)% at 36 h (t= 1. 888, P〉0.05), no statistical defferences were found. Inhibition on platelet activativation induced by ADP function well till 36 h after 300 mg loading dose. PAgTADP decrease from (53. 7 ± 14. 1)% at baseline to (49. 2 ±22. 8)% at 10 h non-statistically (t=0.656, P〉0.05), and (40.7±12.8)% at 36 h statistically (t=2.418, P〈0.05), however PAgTAA decrease at both 10 h and 36 h statiscally, from (34. 3 ± 18. 1) % to (17.4 ± 13. 1) % , (t=3.134, P〈0.05) and (14.6±5.1)%, (t=2.532, P〈0.05), respectively. Data of PAgT was not corresponding to that from TEG for the difference in sample type partly. PRI in VASP assay was (78. 6 ± 22.3)% before loading dose, and decreased to (70.7 ±9.4)% at 10 h without significance (t = l. 194, P〉0.05) and (59.6 ±28.0)% at 36 h (t=1.930,P〈0.05) statistically, similarly to INHADP,indicating that within 36 h clopidogrel did not have strong inhibitory effect on the ADP receptor. On the contrary, CD62p changed from (7. 5 ± 1. 4) % at baseline to (4. 2 ± 1. 1) % statistically (10 h, t = 18. 027, P 〈 0. 05) and ( 4. 3 ± 0. 2 ) % non-statistically (36 h, t = 2. 908, P 〉 0. 05 ). Inhibition of secretion activity reflected by CD62p was significant. In contrast, it was more obvious inhibition in COX-1 passway, while the inhibition of P2Y12 receptor varied due to assay difference. Conclusions AA-induced platelet activation is significantly decreased in the inhibition of clopidogrel and aspirin, while ADP receptor is significantly inhibited until 36 h after the loading dose of clopidogrel. Platelet function in whole blood reflects total activity of platelet interaction with other components, in which no significant inhibition could be witnessed within 10 h.
出处 《中华检验医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第7期636-640,共5页 Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine
关键词 冠心病 噻氯匹定 血小板聚集抑制剂 流式细胞术 Coronary disease Ticlopidine Platelet aggregation inhibitors Flow cytometry
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1Eric L Eisenstein, DBA,Kevin J. Anstrom, PhD,David F. Kong, MD,Linda K. Shaw, MS,Robert H. Tuttle, MSPH,Daniel B. Mark, MD, MPH,Judith M. Kramer, MD, MS,Robert A. Harrington, MD,David B. Matchar, MD,David E. Kandzari, MD 1,Eric D. Peterson, MD, MPH,Kevin A. Schulman, MD,Robert M. Califf, MD,李呈亿(译),David E. Kandzari, MD.氯吡格雷的使用与药物洗脱支架植入后远期临床结果[J].美国医学会杂志(中文版),2007,26(3):131-139. 被引量:59

二级参考文献28

  • 1Moses JW, Leon MB, Poprna JJ, et al. Sirolimus-eluting s-tents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 2003,349:1315-1323.
  • 2Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, et al. One-year clinical results with the slow-release, polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent: the TAXUS-Ⅳ trial. Circulation. 2004;109:1942 - 1947.
  • 3Moses JW. CYPHER trials. Presented at: American College of Cardiology Annual Scientific Session 2006 Rapid News Summaries; March 11-14, 2006; Atlanta, Ga. http://www.cardiosource.com /rapid newssu mmaries/index.asp?EID=22 &DoW=Mon&SumID=165. Accessed July 1, 2006.
  • 4Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2006 update: a report fiom the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2006; 113:e85-e151.
  • 5Leon MB, Bairn DS, Popma J J, et al; Stent Anticoagulation Restenosis Study Investigators. A clinical trial comparing three antithrombotic-drug regimens after coronary-artery stenUng. N Engl J Med. 1998;339: 1665-1671.
  • 6Cutlip DE, Balm DS, Ho KK, et al. Stent thrombosis in the modern era: a pooled analysis of multicenter coronary stent clinical trials. Circulation. 2001, 103:1967-1971.
  • 7Berger PB, Mahaffey KW, Meier S J, et al. Safety and efficacy of only 2 weeks of ticlopicline therapy in patients at increased dsk of coronary stent thrombosis: results from the Antiplatelet Therapy alone versus Lovenox plus Antiplatelet therapy in patients at increased risk of Stent Thrombosis (ATLAST) trial. Am Heart J. 2002;143:841-846.
  • 8Iakovou I, Schmidt T, Bonizzoni E, et al. Incidence, predictors, and outcome of thrombosis after successful implantation of drug-eluting stents. JAMA. 2005;293:2126-2130.
  • 9Spertus JA, Kettelkamp R, Vance C, et al. Prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of premature discontinuation of thienopyridine therapy after drug- eluting stent placement: results from the PREMIER registry. Circulation. 2006;113:2803-2809.
  • 10Regar E, Lemos PA, Saia F, et al. Incidence of thrombotic stent occlusion during the first three months after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in 500 consecutive patients. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:1271- 1275.

共引文献58

同被引文献42

  • 1邹洪.国产氯吡格雷联合国产药物洗脱支架在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2013,5(2):71-73. 被引量:8
  • 2Fritsma GA.Platelet function testing:aggregometry and lumiaggregometry[J].Clin Lab Sci,2007,20(1):32 - 37.
  • 3Selim MH,Molina CA.Platelet function assays in stroke management:more study is needed[J].Stroke,2010,41(10): 2396 - 2397.
  • 4Cuisset T, Frere C,Quilici J,et al.High post-treatment platelet reactivity identified low-responders to dual antiplatelet therapy at increased risk of recurrent cardiovascular events after stenting for acute coronary syndrome[J].J Thromb Haemost,2006,4(3):542 - 549.
  • 5Kim KA,Park PW, Hong SJ,et al.The effect of CYP2C19 polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel:a possible mechanism for clopidogrel resistance[J].Clin Pharmacol Ther,2008,84(2):236 - 242.
  • 6Yu LH, Kim MH, Zhang HZ, et al. Impact of Platelet Function Test on Platelet Responsiveness and Clinical Outcome After Coronary Stent Implantation:Platelet Responsiveness and Clinical Outcome[J]. Korean Circ J, 2012, 42:382-389.
  • 7Kassimis G, Daylouros P, Xanthopoulou I, et al. CYP2C19 * 2 and other genetic variants affecting platelet response to clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention [ J ]. Thromb Res, 2012, 129:441-446.
  • 8Pendyala LK, Torguson R, Loh JP, et al. Racial disparity with on-treatment platelet reactivity in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention[ J]. Am Heart J, 2013, 166:266-272.
  • 9Lain M, Toesca R, Berbis J, et al. Platelet reactivity evaluated with the VASP assay following ticagrelor loading dose in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention[ J]. Thromb Res, 2013,132 :e15-e18.
  • 10Kazui M, Nishiya Y, Ishizuka T, et al. Identification of the human cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in the two oxidative steps in the bioactivation of clopidogrel to its pharmacologically active metabolite[ J]. Drug MetabDispos, 2010, 38:92-99.

引证文献5

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部