期刊文献+

心理学的多元化之路:问题与前景 被引量:2

The Pluralism Trends in Psychological Research:Problems and Prospects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 科学主义心理学为提升心理学的学科地位做出了突出贡献,并奠定了其主流和中心研究范式的地位。但片面地追求心理学的科学化道路导致了当代心理学的分裂和危机。随着极端实证主义研究范式的衰落,逐渐形成了一种无定型、兼容并蓄的边际型结构特征的"后实证主义"倾向,多元方法的融合成为了心理学方法论变革的重要趋势。多种方法的灵活选择有助于更为准确和全面地解释人类的心理活动。 The scientific psychology,as a mainstream and dominant academic paradigm,has made an outstanding contributions for establishing status of discipline.But it is one sided emphasis that scientific psychology leads to the crisis and fragmentation of contemporary psychology."Post Positivism" tendency which amorphous and inclusive marginal structure has formed gradually with the decline of extreme positivist paradigm.At the same time,the integration of multiple methods has become an important trend in changing of psychological methodology.Many psychologists see methodological pluralism as a way to overcome rigid adherence to any one method.The flexible selection of methods will facilitate to understand the psychological activities more accurately and comprehensively.
出处 《西北师大学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第4期105-109,共5页 Journal of Northwest Normal University(Social Sciences)
基金 2009年国家教师教育创新平台建设项目
关键词 心理学 多元方法论 科学主义 实证主义 后实证主义 psychology methodological pluralism scientific psychology positivism post positivism
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Stam H J. Ten years after, decade to come: The contributions of theory to psychology [J]. Theory & Psychology, 2000, 10 (1): 5--21.
  • 2Koch, S. The nature and limits of psychological knowledge: lessons of century qua "science" [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1985.
  • 3Gergen K. Psychological Science in a Postmodern Context [J]. American Psychologist, 2001, 56 (10): 803--813.
  • 4叶浩生.试析现代西方心理学的文化转向[J].心理学报,2001,33(3):270-275. 被引量:66
  • 5[哥伦比亚]阿迪拉著,张航等译.心理学的未来--世界上最著名的一些心理学家对各自领域的未来的看法[M].北京:商务印书馆,2008.
  • 6Spenee J T. Centrifugal and centripetal forces in psychology: Will the center hold? [J].American Psychologist, 1987, 42.
  • 7Stephen C. On the nature of a critical methodology[J]. Theory & Psychology , 2005 , 15 (1): 27--50.
  • 8Pickening J. Consciousness and psychological science [J]. British Journal of Psychology, 1999, 90: 611--624.
  • 9Kim U. Indigenous, cultural, and cross-cultural psychology.. A theoretical, conceptual, and epistemological analysis [J]. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2000, (3): 265--287.
  • 10[英]克里克著,汪九云等译.惊人的假说[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1999.

二级参考文献17

  • 1Spence,J.T.,1987,Centrifugal and centripetal forces in psychology: Will the center hold? in American Psychologist,42.
  • 2Iijia,H.,1997,Cultural malpractice: the growing obsolescence of psychology with the changing U.S.population,in American Psychologist,52(6).
  • 3Schneider,K.,1998,Toward a science of the heart: Romanticism and the revival of psychology,in American Psychologist,53 (3).
  • 4Bevan,W.,1991,Contemporary psychology: A tour inside the onion,in American Psychologist,46(5).
  • 5Pedersen,P.,2001,Multiculturalism and the paradigm shift in counseling:Controversies and alternative futures,in Canadian Journal of Counseling,35( 1 ).
  • 6Yanchar,S.and Slife,B.,1997,Pursuing unity in a fragmented psychology: Problems and prospects,in Review of General Psychology,1(3).
  • 7Szapocznik J, Kurtines W. Familypsychology and cultural diversity. American Psychologist, 1993,48(4):400
  • 8Gergen K J. Social psychology as history. Journal of personality and socialpsychology, 1973, 26(2):309-320
  • 9Sampson E E. Scientific paradigms and social values: Wanted-a scientificrevolution. Journal of personality and social psychology,1978,36:1332-1340
  • 10Prilldtensky I. Psychology and status quo. American Psychologist,1989, 44(5):797

共引文献175

同被引文献27

  • 1方明.西方心理学中两种文化的对立及其思考[J].心理学探新,2000,20(2):8-11. 被引量:5
  • 2葛鲁嘉.心理学的科学观与统一观[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,1996,36(3):1-6. 被引量:18
  • 3徐冬英.心理学的分裂与统一研究述评[J].徐州师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,31(5):124-128. 被引量:5
  • 4[美]华勒斯坦等著,刘锋译.开放社会科学[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1997.
  • 5葛鲁嘉.新心性心理学宣言[M].北京:人民出版社,2008:380.
  • 6Snow, C. P. The two culture and second look [M]. London: Cambridge University Press, 1964.
  • 7Kimble, G A. Psychology's two cultures [J]. American Psychologist, 1984, 39, (8).
  • 8Brockman, J. The Third Culture: Beyond the Scientific Revolution [M]. New York: Simon Schuster, 1995.
  • 9Kagan, J. The Three Cultures: Natural Sciences, Social Sciences, and the Humanities in the 21stCentury [M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
  • 10葛鲁嘉.心理文化论要[M].大连:辽宁师范大学出版社,1995..

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部