摘要
目的:应用正常人新鲜全血对多台血液分析仪进行比对,使血液分析仪各参数之间具有可比性。方法:选择性能良好、规范化操作的血液分析仪作为参比仪,用该仪器定值的健康人新鲜血校准比对3台血液分析仪(比对仪)。结果:3台比对仪白细胞(WBC)比对前偏倚分别为(-7.32、-4.49、-8.70)%,血小板(PLT)比对前偏倚分别为(-4.75、-17.1、-11.8)%;WBC比对后偏倚分别为(-0.3、2.5、-1.7)%,PLT比对后偏倚分别为(-1.7、-0.7、-1.1)%;WBC、PLT差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),RBC、HGB、HCT、MCV差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但相关性存在差异,通过比对试验校准仪器后结果一致性良好。结论:该方法能方便、经济地对血液分析进行有效的质量控制。
Objective:To investigate application of the comparison of fresh whole blood in hematology analyzer.Methods:The hematology analyzer with good performance,and standardized operation was selected as a reference instrument,and the results tested by 3 hematology analyzers with the fresh blood of healthy individuals was calibrated based on the former.Results:For the 3 hematology analyzers,the bias before the comparison were:WBC(-7.32,-4.49,-8.70)%;RBC(-1.34,-3.58,-1.34)% ;HGB(-0.06,1.81,1.69)%;HCT(3.05,1.52,-0.8)%;MCV(0.03,0.67,4.7)%;PLT(-4.75,-17.1,-11.8)%,respectively;the bias after comparison were:WBC(-0.3,2.5,-1.7)%;RBC(0.9,-1.6,-1.3)%;HGB(1.4,0,-0.03)%;HCT(1.7,-0.2,0.3)%;MCV(0.9,-0.6,-0.3)%;PLT(-1.7,-0.7,-1.1)%.There was significant difference in WBC and PLT(P 〈0.05),and no significant difference in RBC,HGB,HCT,MCV((P〉 0.05).But there was differenct relevance.The results by calibrating the equipment were consistent with the comparison test.Conclusions:The method is effective and economical in quality control for the blood analysis.
出处
《海南医学院学报》
CAS
2010年第7期941-943,950,共4页
Journal of Hainan Medical University
基金
海南医学院科研基金资助学报项目(0020100268)~~
关键词
血液分析仪
新鲜全血
比对法
Hematology analyzer
Fresh whole blood
Comparison