期刊文献+

IIF法检测血清抗cmDNA抗体诊断SLE价值的系统评价 被引量:1

Systematic review of using anti-cmDNA antibodies to diagnose the SLE by IIF
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价间接免疫荧光法(IIF)检测血清中抗细胞膜DNA(cmDNA)抗体诊断系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的价值。方法检索1970—2009年PubMed、中国期刊全文数据库,检索词为:系统性红斑狼疮、SLE、自身抗体、细胞膜DNA,收集关于抗cmDNA抗体诊断SLE价值的相关研究文献,根据Whiting等制定的QUADAS文献质量评价工具对文献进行质量评价,使用MetaDisc1.4进行异质性分析、Meta分析及绘制SROC曲线。结果共纳入文献7篇,合计2447例,其中经金标准确认的SLE患者共824例。Meta分析异质性检验辟0.0009,F=73.5%;合并敏感度为69.0%,95%CI为66.0%~72.0%;合并特异度为97.0%,95%CI为96.0%-98.0%;合并阳性似然比+LR=21.37,95%CI为12.17—37.54;合并阴性似然比-LR=0.28,95%CI为0.18~0.45;SROC曲线下面积AUC=0.9336(SE=0.0607)。结论目前间接免疫荧光法检测血清中抗cmDNA抗体诊断SLE有一定的价值,可作为诊断SLE的特异性指标。 Objective To evaluation the signifacance of anticell membrane associated DNA ( cmDNA ) antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus ( SLE ) by indirect immunofluorescence ( IIF ). Methods We searched PubMed and full-text data base of Chinese periodical to identify studies on the diagnostic value of anti-cell membrane associated DNA antibody in patients with SLE. The searching time was from 1970 to 2009. The key words are systemic lupus erythematosus , SLE and autoantibody. Select those valid researches. Performed a systematic reviem of outcomes about laboratory diagnosis for SLE by using Meta-discl.40. MetaDisc was used to analyze heterogeneity, perform meta-analyses and draw sum- mary receiver operator characteristic cmwe ( SROC ).Results The resultes of recta-analysis showed that there was high heterogeneity in the 7 rasearches , the sensitivity and specificity was 69.0% and 97.0v& the positive likelihood ( +LR ) and negative likelihood ( -LR ) was 21.37and 0.28 ; the area under the curve ( AUC ) was 0.9336. Conclusion The autnantibodies to cmDNA by IIF can be used as a special index in diagnosing the SLE.
出处 《国际医药卫生导报》 2010年第13期1630-1634,共5页 International Medicine and Health Guidance News
关键词 系统性红斑狼疮 抗细胞膜DNA抗体 Meta分析 Systemic lupus erythematosus Anti-cell membrane associated DNA antibody Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献35

  • 1陈海英,贾汝琳,栗占国.抗细胞膜DNA抗体的测定及其在系统性红斑狼疮诊断中的意义[J].中华风湿病学杂志,2005,9(4):229-233. 被引量:14
  • 2Servais G, Guillaume MP, Dumarey N, et al. Evidence of autoantibodies to cell membrane associated DNA (cultured lymphocytes):a new specific marker for rapid identification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis, 1998, 57: 606-613.
  • 3Benucci M, Gobbi FL, del Rosso A, et al. Disease activity and antinucleosome antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Scand J Rheumatol, 2003, 32:42--45.
  • 4Min DJ, Kim SJ, Pank SH, et al. Anti-nucleosome antibody: significance in lupus patients lacking anti-double-stranded DNA antibody. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 2002, 20: 13-18.
  • 5Swaak A J, Huysen V, Nossent JC, et al. Antinuclear antibody profiles in relation to specific disease manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rheumatol, 1990, 9." 82-94.
  • 6Canoso RT, de Oliveira RM. Characterization and antigenic specificity of chlorpromazine-induced antinuclear antibodies. J Lab Clin Med, 1986, 108: 213-216.
  • 7Cairns AP, McMillan SA, Crockard AD, et al. Antinucleosome antibodies in the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis, 2003, 62: 272-273.
  • 8Servais G, Daens S, Guillaume MP, et al. Diagnostic specificities and sensitivities of anti-dsDNA, anti-membrane DNA and anti-nucleosomes autoantibodies. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl,2001, 235: 61-67.
  • 9Hochberg MC. Updating the American college of rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum, 1997, 40: 1725.
  • 10Tan E M,Arthritis Rheum,1982年,25卷,1271页

共引文献28

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部