期刊文献+

元代新安理学从“唯朱是宗”到“和会朱陆”的转向 被引量:4

The Turns from "Zhu Being the Only Case" to "the Combination of Zhu and Lu"in Yuan Dynasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 元初的新安理学家以宗朱为特征。他们奉朱熹之说为圭臬,做了大量的理学义理普及与文献整理工作,陈栎、胡一桂、胡炳文是其中代表性人物。唯知株守朱学常常会产生流弊,使朱学流为训诂之学。以朱升、郑玉、赵为代表的新一代新安理学家开始寻求突破,从而使新安理学出现了"和会朱陆"的转向。朱升以"尊德性"统摄"道问学",郑玉力倡朱陆之同,而赵则认为朱陆"早异晚同"。新一代新安理学家"和会朱陆"思想,其实就是想用陆氏"发明本心"的思路来纠正宗朱学者偏执于语言训诂的流弊。 In early Yuan Dynasty,Xin'an school of Confucians was characterized by their homage to Zhu Xi.They took Zhu Xi's theory as the only criterion,and conducted a great amount of work on the popularization of the universal moral principles of Zhu's theory and on the literature reviews of Confucianism.Chen Li,Hu Yigui,Hu Bingwen were representative characters in this school.However,their total homage to Zhu Xi often resulted in abuses of Zhu's theory and reduced it to exegetical study.A new generation of Neo-Confucians,represented by Zhu Sheng,Zheng Yu,Zhao Wei,began to seek a breakthrough so that there came a turning point in Xin'an Confucianism of "the combination of Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan's theories".According to Zhu Sheng,"dharma (essential principal of law or morality)" captained "knowledge".Zheng Yu emphasized the similarities between the theories of Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan,but Zhao reckoned that Zhu and Lu were different in their early ages but similar in the late years.The younger generation of Xin'an Confucians,in effect,tended to utilize Lu Jiuyuan's idea of "crystallizing the truth and following the truth within one's heart" to correct the Zhu scholars' exegetical fallacies.
作者 刘成群
出处 《学术探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期6-12,共7页 Academic Exploration
关键词 宗朱 流弊 训诂 和会 转向 homage to Zhu Xi abuse exegetical study combination of Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan's theories turning point
  • 相关文献

参考文献46

  • 1钱穆.《朱子新学案》.第1—2,14页,第1页,第136-138页,第367页.《钱宾四先生全集》,第11册.
  • 2朱同.《朱学士升传》,《新安文献志》,第1854页.
  • 3吴国英.《环谷汪先生行状》,《全元文》第58册,第292页.
  • 4郑玉.《王居敬字序》,《全元文》第46册,第353页.
  • 5胡炳文.《一心铭》,《全元文》第17册,第167页.
  • 6胡炳文.《正心斋铭》,《全元文》第17册,第166页.
  • 7胡炳文.《自强斋铭》,《全元文》第17册,第167页.
  • 8胡初翁.《贺胡云峰先生归教星源启》,《全元文》第22册,第479页.
  • 9郑忠.《处士鲍公椿行状》,《新安文献志》,第2162页.
  • 10吴师道.《答傅子建书》,《全元文》第34册,第29页.

共引文献9

同被引文献31

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部