期刊文献+

髓内持骨动力性髓内钉治疗四肢长骨中段骨折19例近期疗效分析

Analysis on the short-term efficacy of intramedullary controlled dynamic nailing in the treatment of 19 cases with midshaft fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨髓内持骨动力性髓内钉治疗股骨、胫骨和肱骨中段骨折的近期疗效。方法回顾分析2008-08~2009-08应用髓内持骨动力性髓内钉治疗四肢长骨中段骨折患者的临床资料。术中应用"C"臂机闭合复位,对闭合复位失败者采用有限切开复位内固定,骨折端粉碎严重者行断端自体或混合植骨。结果所有病例均获随访3~14个月,平均8.5个月,19例骨折18例治愈,治愈率为94.7%;骨折平均愈合时间为(16.5±4.2)周;1例发生膝关节僵硬;无发生主钉、锁钉断裂及退出。结论应用髓内持骨动力性髓内钉治疗股骨、胫骨和肱骨中段骨折近期疗效满意,治愈率高,是治疗四肢长骨中段骨折内固定理想方法的选择之一。 Objective To explore the short-term efficacy of intramedullary controlled dynamic nailing in the treatment of midshaft femoral,tibial and humeral fractures. Methods The clinical records of patients with midshaft fractures treated with intramedullary controlled dynamic nailing from August 52008 to August 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. During operation, closed reduction was applied under C arm X ray machine. Finite open reduction and internal fixation was used in patients who failed in closed reduction. Autologous bone grafts or combined bone grafts was used in grave comminuted fracture. Results All the patients were followed up from 3 months to 14 months, with an average of 8. 5 months. Of 19 cases, 18 cases were cured, the cure rate was 94. 7%. the mean healing time was (16. 5 ± 4.2) weeks. Knee stiffness occurred in one patient, no breakage and exiting of nails and locked nails occurred. Conclusion It can get satisfactory short-term efficacy and high cure rate in treatment of midshaft femoral , tibial and humeral fractures by intramedullary controlled dynamic nailing. It is one of the good techniques in treating midshaft fractures.
出处 《中国临床新医学》 2010年第6期526-528,共3页 CHINESE JOURNAL OF NEW CLINICAL MEDICINE
基金 佛山市科技局科技攻关立项课题(No.200808159)
关键词 中段骨折 内固定术 髓内持骨动力性髓内钉 Midshaft fractures Internal fixation Intramedullary controlled dynamic nailing
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献29

  • 1李智,王臻,孙峥.有限接触式带锁髓内钉的有限元分析及临床应用[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(14):1082-1085. 被引量:6
  • 2罗先正 邱贵兴 主编.髓内钉固定:第8版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1998.6.
  • 3JOHNER R, WRUSH O. Classification of tibial shaft fractures and correclation with results after rigid fixatio [J]. Clin Orthop,1983, (178): 7-25.
  • 4BROWNER DB, JUPITER JB, LEVINE AM, et al. Skeletal trauma. WB Saunders, Philadelphia.
  • 5STEFANO L, NICOLA C, LUCIANO L, et al. Preliminary clinical. and adiographic results with the Fixion intramedullary nail:an inflatable self-locking system for long bone fractures[J]. J Orthopaed Traumatol, 2001, 2000: 135-140.
  • 6Ito H, Shirai Y. The efficacy of ununited tibial fracture treatment using pulsing electromagnetic fields;relation to biological activity on nonunion bone ends. J Nippon Med Sch, 2001, 68(2): 149- 153.
  • 7Widjaja W, Hartung C. Biomechanical comparison of different fixations of femur-interlocking-nails. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2001, 16 (8):702-705.
  • 8Alfahd U, Roth SE, Stephen D, et al. Biomechanical comparison of intramedullary nail and blade plate fixation for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. J Orthop Trauma, 2005,19(10) :703-708.
  • 9Verbruggen JP, Stapert JW. Failure of reamed nailing in humeral non-union: an analysis of 26 patients. Injury, 2005, 36(3):430- 438.
  • 10Hasenboehler E, Smith WR, Laudicina L, et al. Fatigue behavior of Ilizarov frame versus tibial interlocking nail in a comminuted tibial fracture model: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Surg, 2006,1 : 16.

共引文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部