期刊文献+

腹腔镜与小切口手术切除胆囊治疗胆结石效果对比分析 被引量:21

Comparative analysis of laparoscopic and small incision cholecystectomy in the treatment of gallstone
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的临床价值。方法回顾分析腹腔镜胆囊切除124例(A组)及小切口开放性胆囊切除52例(B组)的临床资料,就恢复正常工作时间、手术时间、住院总费用、术后住院总天数、并发症等指标进行比较。结果 A组在手术操作时间、术中出血量、术后下床活动时间、术后住院总天数、恢复正常工作时间、并发症方面明显优于B组,差异有显著意义(P<0.01);B组住院总费用略低于A组。结论腹腔镜胆囊切除术具有创伤小、出血少、术后疼痛轻、恢复快、腹腔干扰少等优点,效果优于小切口开放手术。 Objective To evaluate the clinical value of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods The clinical datas of 124 cases( group A)receiving laparoscopic cholecysrectomy and 52 cases (group B)receiving open small slice cholecystectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Operating time, amount of intestinal function after operation, ambulation and normal activities after operation, the hospital stay and complications were compared between group A and group 8. Results In group A, operating time, the amount of bleeding during operation, the recovery of normal activities after operation and the occurrence of complications were all better than those of in group B( P 〈 0.01 ) ,while in group B, operating cost,and the total cost of hospitalization were slighly better than group A. Conclusion Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has the advantages of rapid recovery,less pain, bleed little,belly cavity interfarence is little and after operation the bowel gtue to connect small. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy needs ahigher skill ,but is superior to open small slice eholecystectomy.
出处 《中国医学创新》 CAS 2010年第17期39-40,共2页 Medical Innovation of China
关键词 胆结石 胆囊切除术 腹腔镜 Cholelithiasis Cholecystectomy Aparoscopic
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1黄志强 黎鳌.小切口胆囊切除术[J].外科手术学,1998,12:44-45.
  • 2陈金华 何光荣 黄晓春 等.LC与小切口胆囊切除术在治疗胆结石胆囊炎过程中的比较分析[J].中外健康文摘,2009,(14):110-112.

同被引文献106

引证文献21

二级引证文献140

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部