期刊文献+

科学合理性的新理解——一种基于实践规范观的探析 被引量:1

On a possible understanding of rationality of science
原文传递
导出
摘要 科学合理性是现代西方科学哲学讨论的核心论题;基于实践规范观的科学合理性探析有助于把握科学合理性的新内涵。不同的规范观,决定了对科学合理性的不同理解;从哲学史的视角概述了两种规范观及其与之对应的科学合理性理解要旨。与理论优位的科学哲学所秉持的抽象理性规范观不同,科学实践哲学主张一种实践境况规范观,从而使重新理解科学合理性的本质及其评价问题成为可能。进一步阐明了实践境况规范的历史性和地方性在存在论意义上所决定的科学合理性评价的实践性理解;揭示了由规范适用范围、适用时间和规范力量三个基本维度构成的科学合理性评价体系,并基于此探究了科学合理性规范评价的若干尺度。 How to understand the rationality of science is radically decided by what kinds of notion of nomativity is hold.This paper outlines the two kinds of nomativity concepts and their corresponding the essence understanding of rationality of science.Abstract rational concept of norm upholded by thoery-domimant philosophy of science is different from practical situated view point of norm advocated by philosophy of scientific practice,and the later offers a new possibility of understanding of scientific rationality.The historicity and locality of practical situated norms determined the understanding of rationality of science under the embodied practical situation;revealed an evaluating system consisted of the scope of norm,application time,and normative force.
作者 于金龙
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第7期961-967,共7页 Studies in Science of Science
关键词 科学合理性 实践境况规范观 科学合理性评价 rationality of science the theory of situation-based norm the evaluation of scientific rationality of science
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1诺尔-塞蒂娜.制造知识:建构主义与科学的与境性[M].鲁旭东译.北京:东方出版社,2001.
  • 2Quine W V O. Epistemology Naturalized Hilary Kornblithed. Naturalizing epistemology, Cambridge, Massa- chusetts London[ M ]. England: The MIT Press, 1994, 15 -31.
  • 3卡尔·波普尔.客观知识[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1987.126、41.
  • 4Laudan L. Progress or rationality? the prospects for normative naturalism[ J]. American Philosophical Quarterly, 1987,24 : 19 - 31.
  • 5约瑟夫·劳斯.知识与权力[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2004..
  • 6Rouse J. Engaging Science: How to Understand Its Practices Philosophically[ M]. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1996.
  • 7Rouse J. How Scientific Practices Matter: Reclaiming Philosophical Naturalism[ M ]. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press,2002.
  • 8托马斯·库恩 著 金吾伦 译.科学革命的结构[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003..
  • 9B·拉图尔,S·伍尔加.实验室生活:科学事实的建构构成[M].北京:东方出版社,2004.
  • 10Hacking I. Representing and Intervening [ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1984.

二级参考文献19

  • 1于金龙,吴彤.科学哲学中的规范性研究述评[J].哲学动态,2007(1):46-52. 被引量:4
  • 2Gooding, D. ; Pinch, T. J. and Schaffer, S. ( ed. ) , The Uses of Experiment. Studies of Experimentation in the Natura Science, Cambridge University Press, 1989.
  • 3Pickering, A. , The Mangle of Practice - Time ,Agency and Science, The University of Chicago Press, 1995.
  • 4Radder, H. (ed). , The Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation, University of Pittsburgh Press ,2003.
  • 5Ackermann, R. , The new experimentalism, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1989,40, pp. 90 -185.
  • 6Mayo, Deborah G. , Error and the growth of experimental knowledge, University of Chicago Press, 1996.
  • 7Rouse, J. , Knowledge and Power. Toward a Political Philosophy of Science, Comell University Press, 1987.(已有中译本,盛晓明等译,北京大学出版社,2004).
  • 8Rouse, J. , How Scientific Practices Matter. Reclaiming Philosophical Naturalism, The University of Chicago Press .2002.
  • 9吴彤.《回顾与前瞻.科学前沿革命与科学哲学发展》,吴倬主编.《在二十一世纪的地平线上.清华人文社科学者展望21世纪》,东方出版社,2001,第391~404页.
  • 10Atran, S. , Cognitive Foundations of Natural History. Toward an Anthropology of Science, Cambridge University Press, 1990.

共引文献404

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部