期刊文献+

论作为基本权利的健康权 被引量:90

Right to Health as a Fundamental Human Right
原文传递
导出
摘要 对于"基本权利",应该理解为经宪法实定化后的人权,即宪法保障的权利。但不能认为只有宪法上予以确认的权利才是基本权利,宪法对于基本权利的明确确认与否只能产生宪法解释学上的区别。除了宪法文本以外,宪法实践特别是司法实践也是判断一项权利是不是基本权利的重要参考标准。健康权是一项基本权利,在司法实践当中也正逐步得到各国的确认。我国宪法上有多个条款可以作为健康权的依据,其规范内涵是:公民健康不受侵犯(第33条第3款,第36条第3款);公民在患病时有权从国家和社会获得医疗照护、物质给付和其他服务(第33条第3款,第45条第1款);国家应发展医疗卫生事业、体育事业,保护生活和生态环境,从而保护和促进公民健康(宪法第21条、第26条第1款)。 The 'basic rights' should be understood as human rights defined by the Constitution, that is the rights guaranteed by the Constitution. But it can not say that only human rights defined by the Constitution are fundamental rights. Whether the fundamental rights are recognized by the Constitution can only affect the meanings in theory of constitution construction. In addition to constitutional text, constitutional practice, especially the judicial practice, is also an important standard to determine the fundamental rights. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and many other international human rights documents provide the right to health. 67.5% of the countries in the world include the right to health in their constitutions, which can be divided into goal-oriented, rights-based, obligation-based, principles-based and direct-type five categories. The right to health is a fundamental right. In the judicial practice, it is also being gradually recognized by States. There are several provisions in our Constitution can be looked as grounds for the right to health. Its normative connotations include: the health of citizens is inviolable (Article 33rd Section 3, Article 36th Section 3); citizens are entitled to attain medical care, physical payments and other services from the state and society when they are in ill (Article 33rd Section 3, Article 45th Section 1); the state should develop medical and health services, sports enterprise, protection of the living and ecological environment, in order to protect and promote the citizens health (Article 21, Article 26th Section 1).
作者 焦洪昌
出处 《中国政法大学学报》 2010年第1期12-19,共8页 Journal Of CUPL
基金 司法部"国家法治与法学理论研究"项目<公民健康权的保护和国家义务>的部分成果 项目编号:06SFB2023
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

  • 1Constitutional Theory : Arguments and Perspective, Review and Edited by Michael J, Gerhardt, Thomas D. Rowe, Jr. Rebecca L. Brown, Girardeau A. Spann. Matthew Bender & Company Ine, 2000. p. 66.
  • 2Encyclopedia of the American Constitution, edited by Leonard W. Levy and Kenneth L. Karst, Macmillan Reference USA, 2000,p. 2681.
  • 3Antonin Sealia, A Matter of Interpretation t Federal Courts and the Law, Princeton University Press, 1997, p. 38.
  • 4Antonin Sealia, A Matter of Interpretation : Federal Courts and the Law, pp. 38- 39 , 38- 39,40.
  • 5Keith E. Whittington, Constitutional Interpretation : Textual Meaning, Original intent, and Judicial Review, University Press of Kansas, 1999, p. 50.
  • 6Antonin Scalia, A Matter of Interpretation : Federal Courts and the Law, pp. 37-38.
  • 7Antonin Scalia, A Matter of Interpretation : Federal Courts and the Law, pp. 23- 24,24- 25. 18
  • 8[德]拉伦兹.《法学方法论》,杨爱娥译,台北:五南图书出版公司,1996年,第86页.
  • 9Brown V. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U. S, 483(1954).
  • 10杜维运.《史学方法论·绪论》.康乐,彭明辉主编.《史学方法与历史解释》.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,2005年,第113页.

共引文献41

同被引文献1260

引证文献90

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部