期刊文献+

基于损害和成本的环境污染损失核算——以山东省为例 被引量:33

Environmental Pollution Loss Accounting Based on Damage and Cost——The Case of Shandong Province
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文在回顾相关研究成果的基础上,在SEEA中,建立基于损害和成本的环境污染损失核算指标体系,比较两种核算方法的技术特征,并以山东省为例,运用这两种方法,对2000—2005年大气污染和水污染造成的各种经济损失进行核算。结果表明,与成本法相比,基于损害的污染损失评估方法和指标体系更为合理,能够较全面地反映经济活动造成的环境退化。针对计算期内山东省环境污染损失增长较快、其占GDP比重上升、且治理投入规模与污染损失存在较大缺口等具有典型性的问题,提出加强环境污染损失控制的政策建议:建立完善绿色GDP核算体系,大力发展新兴战略性产业,加快推进环境税试点,采取多元化的污染治理模式,促进产业绿色、低碳化、可持续发展。 Along with the deepening understanding of environmental value,the evaluation methodology of environment economic loss and its index system have been continuously improved with the progress of environmental science and economics.Following an overall review on the related literature,this paper sets up the accounting index systems of environmental pollution loss in SEEA based on damage and cost respectively as well as comparing the technical characteristics of the two accounting methods.The various economic losses which were brought from air and water pollution have been accounted for Shandong province from 2000 to 2005 with the 2 methods and index systems.The outcome of the accounting indicates that the evaluating method based on damage is more applicable than the method based on cost with accuracy in reflecting the environmental degradation.Also learned from the typical case of Shandong province,the loss of environmental pollution based on damage is excess to the investment of pollution treatment with bigger gap in between.Therefore,it calls for more effective legislation and policy measures to control the loss of environmental pollution and achieve green,low-carbon and sustainable development in the accelerating process of China’s industrialization.
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第7期125-135,共11页 China Industrial Economics
基金 中国社会科学院2010年度国情调研项目"山东省工业污染排放情况及治理效果"
关键词 环境污染损失 环境损害 治理成本 市场价值法 environmental pollution loss environmental damage treatment cost market value method
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Krutilla, John V. Some Environmental Effects of Economic Development[J]. Daedalus, 1967,96(4).
  • 2Dean, J.M. Does Trade Liberalization Harm the Environment? A New Test [J]. Canadian Journal of Economics, 2002, 35(4).
  • 3Dubourg, W.R. Estimating the Mortality Costs of Lead Emission in England and Wales[J]. Energy Policy, 1990, 24(7).
  • 4Euston Quah, and Tay Liam Boon. The Economic Cost of Particulate Air Pollution on Health in Singapore[J]. Journal of Asian Economics, 2003, 14(1).
  • 5Cowell, D.,and Apsimon H. Estimating the Cost of Damage to Buildings by Acidifying Atmospheric Pollution in Europe[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 1996, 30(17).
  • 6Delucchi, M. A., Murphy J.J., and McCubbin D.R. The Health and Visibility Cost of Air Pollution: A Comparison of Estimation Methods[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2002, 64(2).
  • 7Seung-Jun Kwak, Seung-Hoon Yoo, and Tai-Yoo Kim. A Constructive Approach to Air-quality Valuation in Korea[J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, (38).
  • 8过孝民.公元2000年中国环境预测与对策研究[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1990..
  • 9夏光,赵毅红.中国环境污染损失的经济计量与研究[J].管理世界,1995,11(6):198-205. 被引量:80
  • 10郑易生,阎林,钱薏红.90年代中期中国环境污染经济损失估算[J].管理世界,1999,15(2):189-197. 被引量:73

二级参考文献82

共引文献294

同被引文献386

引证文献33

二级引证文献205

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部