期刊文献+

辩论的逻辑模型研究综述 被引量:6

A Survey of Research on Logic Model of Argumentation
原文传递
导出
摘要 辩论的逻辑模型是哲学、逻辑学和人工智能等多个领域的研究课题,在非单调推理、法律推理、决策支持和多Agent交互等领域有广泛应用.文中首先简要阐述辩论及辩论模型的基本概念.然后从对辩论建模和用辩论建模两个方面对目前的研究进行总结,分析现有的有影响的辩论模型特点及其存在的问题.最后,指出今后的研究方向和发展趋势. The logic model of argumentation is the topic in many fields such as philosophy, logic, and artificial intelligence, and is widely applied in many areas such as non-monotonic reasoning, legal reasoning, group decision-making and interaction of multi-agent system (MAS). In this paper, the basic concepts and logic models of argumentation are firstly expounded. Then the present researches both on modeling for argumentation and on modeling with argumentation are summarized, and the characteristics and problems of current influential logic models of argumentation are analyzed. Finally, the existing challenges and potential research directions of the logic model of argumentation are pointed out.
出处 《模式识别与人工智能》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期362-368,共7页 Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence
基金 湖北省教育厅重点科研资助项目(No.D20101402)
关键词 非单调推理 辩论 辩论模型 争议评价 Non-Monotonic Reasoning, Argumentation, Logic Model of Argumentation, ArgumentEvaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献52

  • 1Prakken H,Vreeswijk G A W.Encoding Schemes for a Discourse Support System for Legal Argument// Proc of the ECAI Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument.Lyon,France,2002:31 -39.
  • 2Janssen T.Toulmin-Based Logic in Policy Decision Making//Miramond M,Gauffre P L,Behesti R,et al,eds.A Critical Review of the Application of Advanced Technologies in Architecture,Civil and Urban Engineering.Paris,France:Europia Productions,1995:315 -332.
  • 3Rowe G,Macagno F,Reed C,et al.Araucaria as a Tool for Diagramming Arguments in Teaching and Studying Philosophy.Teaching Philosophy,2006,29(2):111-124.
  • 4Tweed C.Supporting Argumentation Practices in Urban Planning and Design.Computers,Environment and Urban Systems,1998,22(4):351 -363.
  • 5Dung P M.On the Acceptability of Arguments and Its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning,Logic Programming and n-Person Games.Artificial Intelligence,1995,77(2):321 -357.
  • 6Alvarado S E,Dyer M G.Analogy Recognition and Comprehension in Editorials//Proc of the 7th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Irvine,USA,1985:228-235.
  • 7Amgoud L,Serrurier M.Agents That Argue and Explain Classifications.Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agents Systems,2008,16(2):187 -209.
  • 8Amgoud L,Prade H.Using Arguments for Making and Explaining Decisions.Artificial Intelligence,2009,173(3/4):413-436.
  • 9Amgoud L,Cayrol C.Inferring from Inconsistency in PreferenceBased Argumentation Frameworks.Journal of Automated Reasoning,2002,29(2):125 -169.
  • 10Amgoud L,Kaci S.An Argumentation Framework for Merging Conflicting Knowledge Bases.International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,2007,45(2):321 -340.

同被引文献66

  • 1蔡曙山.认知科学背景下的逻辑学——认知逻辑的对象、方法、体系和意义[J].江海学刊,2004(6):23-30. 被引量:18
  • 2谭俊峰,张朋柱,黄丽宁.综合集成研讨厅中的研讨信息组织模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(1):86-92. 被引量:23
  • 3唐锡晋,刘怡君.从群体支持系统到创造力支持系统[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(5):63-71. 被引量:17
  • 4Liao Beishui, Huang Huaxin. ANGLE : An Autonomous, Normative and Guidable Agent with Changing Knowledge. Information Sci- ences, 2010, 180(17): 3117-3139.
  • 5Modgil S, Luck M. Argumentation Based Resolution of Conflicts between Desires and Normative Goals//Proe of the 5th Internation- al Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. Estoril, Portugal, 2008:19-36.
  • 6Rotstein N D, Garcta A J, Simari G R. Defeasible Argumentation Support for an Extended BDI Architecture//Proc of the 4th Interna- tional Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. Honolulu, USA, 2007:145-163.
  • 7Gaertner D, Toni F. Preferences and Assumption-Based Argumenta- tion for Conflict-Free Normative Agents// Proc of the 4th Interna- tional Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. Honolulu, USA, 2007:94-113.
  • 8Falappa M A, Kern-Isberner G, Simari G R. Explanations, Belief Revision and Defeasible Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 2002, 141(1/2) : 1-28.
  • 9Alsinet T, Chesfievar C I, Godo L, et al. A Logic Programming Framework for Possibilistic Argumentation: Formalization and Logi-cal Properties. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2008, 159(10) : 1208 - 1228.
  • 10Simari G R, Garcia A J, Capobianco M. Actions, Planning and Defeasible Reasoning//Proc of the 10th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning. Whistler, Canada, 2004 : 377-384.

引证文献6

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部