期刊文献+

从意识形态批判到“后技术理性”建构——马尔库塞技术批判理论的现代性诠释 被引量:17

From the Critique of Ideology to the Construction of "Post-technological Rationality"——Marcuse's Technology Critique in the Perspective of Modernity
原文传递
导出
摘要 作为现代性批判重要组成部分,法兰克福学派技术批判通常与意识形态批判结合在一起,并通过"意识形态"及"理性"等概念在一定程度上实现了技术与现代性研究的融合。面对现代社会科技发展现状,法兰克福学派抛弃科学与意识形态无关理论,认为意识形态已经渗透到生产过程中,技术扮演意识形态角色甚至已成为意识形态。不存在绝对不变的客观理性,理性内涵处于历史演化中,技术合理性领域是技术演化最新结果,技术理性已经成为新意识形态核心内容。重建现代性,走向后技术理性会进一步释放技术解放潜能。 As an important part of the!critique of modernity,the technology critique of Frankfurt School of is usually combined with the critique of ideology,and through the use of the core concepts of "ideology" and "rationality",Frankfurt School,to some extent,achieve the integration of technology studies and modernity theory.Facing the technology development situation in advanced industrial society,the Frankfurt school had abandon the idea that science had nothing to do with ideology,they claimed that ideology has infiltrated into the production process per se.Science and Technology plays the same role as ideology or even has become the ideology itself.The notion of rationality is changeable,and the field of technical rationality is the latest result of the evolution of rationality.Technological rationality has become the core of the new ideology.The reconstruction of modernity and the construction of the post-technological rationality can liberate the potential of technology.
作者 张成岗
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第7期43-48,共6页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 国家社科基金青年项目"当代西方技术与现代性研究及其启示"(05CZX007)
关键词 技术 技术理性 意识形态 后技术理性 technology technical rationality ideology post-technological rationality
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1[法]路易·阿尔都塞.保卫马克思[M].顾良译.北京:商务印书馆,1984.
  • 2[德]霍克海默.批判理论[M].重庆:重庆出版社,1989.250.
  • 3[美]赫伯特·马尔库塞.单向度的人[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1989.190.
  • 4Anthony Giddens. The Consequences of Modernity[M]. Stanford : Stanford University Press, 1990 : 1.
  • 5马尔库塞.现代文明与人的困境-马尔库塞文集[M].上海:上海三联书店,1989.176,79.
  • 6Zygmunt Bauman. Postmodern Ethics[M]. Bleckwell, 1998 : 166.
  • 7Thomas J Misa. Philip Brey and Andrew Feenberg Ed. Modernity and Technology[M]. MIT Press, 2003 = 40 - 41.
  • 8Juergen Habermas, Thephilosophical Discourseof Modernity [M], tran, Frederick Lawrence, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987: 2.
  • 9Ross Abbinnett. Maxism after Modernity: Politics, Technology and Social Transformation[M]. Palgrave Macmallian, 2006 : 78,79.
  • 10Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno. Dialectics of Enlightenment[M]. New York:The Continuum Publishing Corporation, 1972 : 6,23.

共引文献99

同被引文献175

引证文献17

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部