摘要
法律解释学自产生之日起,就一直受到种种质疑(如它可能导致法治的消解),而法律解释学界迄今似乎并未有力地回应这些质疑。之所以造成这种局面,主要是因为法律解释学本身还没能清楚地解决如下一些问题:它的理论依据似乎游移于传统解释学与哲学解释学之间;它对"解释"的解释并不清晰,因为当前的法律解释学似乎没能意识到解释其实同时是方法、存在并且还具有哲学研究的属性;它一定程度上无视法律解释学与法律解释之间的互渗、纠缠,这种无视反过来又模糊了它对自身的定位;等等。可以说,只有当法律解释学厘清了上述问题,才可能较好地回应当前的诸种质疑,进而证立其自身的必要性和正当性。
Legal hermeneutics has been oppugned from the time it was born, which has not been replied reasonably by scholars of legal interpretation. The reason for legal hermeneutics can not deal with the questions is that it even has not yet defined its theoretical base clearly. To great extent, there has been no conclusion whether the traditional hermeneuties or the philosophy hermeneutics is the theoretical base for legal interpretation, which leads to a further problem whether legal interpretation is a method or the existence of implement of law. It can be said that if only legal hermeneutics can give clear answers to these problems, then it can reply all the inquiries to it and justify its legitimacy.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第4期32-39,共8页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
周赟主持之福建省社科联青年基金项目"法律解释学的根本悖谬"(项目号2008C005)的主要阶段性成果
关键词
解释
法律解释学
法律解释
传统解释学
哲学解释学
interpretation
legal hermeneuties
legal interpretation
traditional hermeneutics
philosophy hermeneulies
