期刊文献+

认知诊断测验编制的理论及方法 被引量:12

Theory and Method on Compilation of Cognitive Diagnosis Test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 认知诊断测验的优劣直接影响诊断的效果及质量。与传统测验相比,认知诊断测验在测验目的和功能、测验编制的理论基础以及测验项目质量的评价标准方面均存在不同。本文梳理了目前国内外几种认知诊断测验编制的相关理论及方法,并提出了认知诊断测验编制的基本过程,即确定诊断目标→构建认知模型→认知诊断测验项目设计→项目编写→项目测量学参数获取→测验组卷,为认知诊断测验的编制研究者及实际编制者提供一定的参考和指导。 Cognitive diagnosis test affects the effect and quality of cognitive diagnosis directly.Compared with traditional test,the cognitive diagnosis test has difference in followings aspects:the purposes and functions of test,the theories of test compiling and the assessment indexes of test quality etc.This paper outlines several related theories and methods on compiling cognitive diagnosis test domestic and overseas.And put forward the basic process of compiling cognitive diagnosis test as follows:1) conforming the objections 2)constructing a cognitive model,3)designing the items,4)compiling test items,5)obtaining items parameters,6)compiling the test,which provides references to researchers and real workers and for developing and perfecting the test.
出处 《考试研究》 2010年第3期79-92,共14页 Examinations Research
关键词 认知诊断 认知诊断测验 认知设计系统 证据中心设计 cognitive diagnosis cognitive diagnosis test Cognitive Design System Evidence-Centered Design
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Leighton J. P. & Girl M. ( 2007 ). Verbal reports as data for cognitive diagnostic assessment. In J. P. Leighton & M. Girl ( Eds. ), Cognitive diagnostic assessment for education : Theory and Applications ( pp. 146 - 172). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge university press.
  • 2Leighton J. P. (2004). Avoiding misconceptions, misuse, and missed opportunities: The collection of verbal reports in educational achievement testing. Educational measurement:Issues and practice ,4,1 - 10.
  • 3Embretson,S. E. (1998). A cognitive design system approach to generating valid tests: Application to abstract reasoning. Psychological Methods. 3,300 -326.
  • 4周骏,戴海琦,徐淑媛.基于认知理论的测验编制技术—项目生成[J].心理学探新,2007,27(4):64-68. 被引量:4
  • 5Mislevy, R. J. , Steinberg, L. S. , &Almond, R. G. (2003). On the role of task model variables in assessment design. In Siring & P. Kyullonene ( Eds. ), Generating items for cognitive tests : Theory and practice. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
  • 6Behrens, J. T. , Mislay, R. J. , Bauer, M. , Williamson, D. M & Levier. (2004). Introduction to evidence - centered design and lessons learned from its application in a global e-learning program. International journal of testing ,4,295 - 302.
  • 7Norris S. P. , Mac nabs J. S. , & Phillips L. M. ( 2007 ). Cognitive modeling of performance on diagnostic achievement tests : A philosophical analysis and justification. In J. P. Leighton & M. Girl ( Eds. ) , Cognitive diagnostic assessment for education :Theory and Applications ( pp. 119 - 145 ). Cambridge, UK : Cambridge university press.
  • 8Leighton J. P. ,Girl M. & Hunk S. M. (2004). The attribute hierarchy method for cognitive assessment :A variation on Asoka' s rule - space approach. Journal of educational.
  • 9Groin J. (2007). Test construction and diagnostic testing. In J. P. Leighton & Muggier ( Eds. ), Cognitive diagnostic assessment for education : Theory and Applications ( pp. 173 - 201 ). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge university press.
  • 10Briggs, D. C. , Alonzo, A. C. , Schwab, C. , & Wilson, M. ( 2006 ). Diagnostic assessment with ordered multiple - choice items. Educational assessment, 11 ( 1 ) ,33 - 63.

二级参考文献21

  • 1Alderton D L, Larson G E. Dimensionality of Raven' s Advanced Progressive Matrices items.Educational and Psychological Mea- surement, 1990,50: 877 - 900.
  • 2Bejar I I. A generative analysis of a three - dimensional spatial task. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1990, 14 ( 3 ) : 237 - 245.
  • 3Bejar I I.Generative response modeling: Leveraging the computer as a test delivery medium (ETS Research Report).Princeton, NJ: Enducational Testing Service, 1996.
  • 4Carroll J B.Maxwell S. Individual difference in ability. Annual Review of Psychology, 1979,30:603 - 640.
  • 5Enmbretson S E.Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 1983, 93 : 179 - 197.
  • 6Embretson S E.Processes in abstract reasoning: A test of the Carpenter, Just, Shell theory. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kansas, Lawrence, 1993a.
  • 7Embretson S E. Psychometric models for learning and cognitive processes. In: N. Frederiksen, R.J. Mislevy I I Bejar, Eds.Test theory for a new generation of tests. Hitlsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993b. 125 - 150.
  • 8Embretson S E. Applications of cognitive design systems to test development. In: C.R.Reynolds, FA.Cognitive assessment: A muhidisciplinary perspective. New York, NY: Plenium Press, 1994. 107 - 135.
  • 9Embretson S E. Developments toward a cognitive design system for psychological tests. In: D. Lubinsky, R. Dawes, Eds. Assessing individual differences in human behavior: New concepts, methods, and findings. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press, 1995.
  • 10Embretson S E. Cognitive design principles and the successful performer: A study on spatial ability. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1996,33:29 - 39.

共引文献25

同被引文献152

引证文献12

二级引证文献350

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部