摘要
文章从校勘学角度,利用本校和他校等方法,纠正了《昭陵碑石》一书对李思摩墓志中突厥官号特勤的错误抄录,以及《唐代墓志汇编续集》和陕西师大艾冲教授等在著录和研究中引用的错误。在回顾特勤和特勒之争历史的基础上,指出唐李思摩墓志属于特勤说的又一个新的实物证据。
The official title（tele）of Li Simo is wrong in the copy of epitaphs in the book ＂Zhao Ling Gravestones＂. It is proved from the collating view with many methodologies. Meanwhile,the wrong citations in ＂Continuation of Tang Epitaphs＂ and the works of Professor Ai Chong（Shaanxi Normal University）et a are also found. Reviewing the arguments between Tele and Teqin,Li＇ s epitaph is another evidence for Tele hypothesis.
出处
《哈尔滨学院学报》
2010年第7期119-124,共6页
Journal of Harbin University
