期刊文献+

高管人员薪酬、自由现金流量对公司风险承担之影响 被引量:11

The Effects of Manager’s Compensation and Free Cash Flow to Risk-Taking for Firm
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究目的在于调查2002年至2004年间,中国上市公司之高管人员薪酬与自由现金流量,对于公司风险承担的影响,同时剖析两者之交互效果。此外,在进行公司规模分组后,进一步观测大小公司是否存在显著差异。实证结果显示提高高管人员薪酬确能有效降低公司风险的承担,且过多的自由现金流量及营运状况不佳的公司,会具有较高的违约风险,但藉由高管人员薪酬的增加,方可降低自由现金流量所产生的负面效果。在公司规模分组方面,上述效果仅发现存在于小规模的公司,大公司均无统计上的显著关联。对此结果,本研究亦推论此差异可归因于大规模公司具有较高的政治成本和高经济景气联动两个原因所引致。 The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of manager' s compensation and free cash flow to risk - taking in China public offering companies over 2002 to 2004, and to analyze the interactive effects. In addition, we further examine whether the size effect has a significantly difference after separating firm size into large and small sub - sample. The empirical results present that the increasing the manager' s compensation can effectively reduce the risk - taking for firm, and the firm of higher free cash flow as well as bad performance will hold the highly default risk. However, the negative influence from free cash flow can be offset by increasing manager' s compensation. In the sub - samples, these outcomes are only found in the group of small size but not in the group of large size. Regarding the results this paper infer that the reason may contribute to the effects of both higher political cost or higher economic environment in large firms.
出处 《科学决策》 2010年第7期10-17,73,共9页 Scientific Decision Making
关键词 高管人员薪酬 自由现金流量 公司规模 政治成本 Manager' s compensation free cash flow firm size political cost
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1黄健铭 简郁蓉 郑婉秀.台湾金融机构公司治理特性与违约风险之探讨.会计与公司治理,2008,5(1):33-54.
  • 2Agarwal,N.,Determinants of Executive Compensation[J].Industrial Relations,1981,36-46.
  • 3Antle,R.,Smith,A.,An Empirical Investigation of the Relative Performance Evaluation of Corporate Executives[J].Journal of Accounting Research,1986,24:1-39.
  • 4Balkin.D.B.,Gomez-Mejia,L.R.,Toward a Contingency Theory of Compensation Strategy[J].Strategic Management Journal,1987,18:169-182.
  • 5Black,F.and Scholes M.,The Pricing Of Options And Corporate Liabilities[J].Journal of Political Economy,1973,81:637-659.
  • 6Christie,A.A.,Zimmerman,J.,Efficient and Opportunistic Choices of Accounting Procedures:Corporate Control Contests[J].Accounting Review,1994,69(4):539-566.
  • 7Crouhy,M.,Galai,D.,Mark,R.,A Comparative Analysis of Current Credit Risk Models[J].Journal of Banking and Finance,2000,24 (1):59-117.
  • 8Fama,E.,Agency Problem and the Theory of the Finn[J].Journal of Political Economy,1980,88:288-307.
  • 9Fu,C.J.,Executive Compensation,Ownership,and Firm Performance,Sun Yat-Sen Management Review,2001,95-116.
  • 10Gianluca,O.,Dacorogna,M.M.,Jung,T.,Credit Risk Models-Do They Deliver Their Promises? a Quantitative Assessment[J].Economic Notes,2002,32:177-195.

同被引文献296

引证文献11

二级引证文献398

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部