民事抗诉案件中检察机关调查取证权的完善

Civil Protest Cases Procuratorial Organs RI of Perfection

在民事诉讼检察监督的实务中,检察机关常常对案件事实进行调查,并依据调查过程收集到的能够证明法院对案件事实做出错误认定的证据提出抗诉。然而,检察机关依据其调查的新证据提出抗诉是否会使双方当事人在诉讼中处于失衡的地位,使申请抗诉的一方借助检察机关的公权力来收集对自己有利的证据,这是颇具争议的问题。那么,检察机关在抗诉监督的过程中能否对已被法院认定的案件事实重新调查取证?能否依据调取的新证据提出抗诉?本文将针对以上问题进行分析论证。

In civil proceedings in the practice of procuratorial supervision,procuratorial organs often on the facts of a case for investigation,and by the courts of being able to prove the facts of a case to make error identification evidence protest. However,the procuratorial organ on the basis of its investigation of new evidence to protest whether both parties in the action＇s status is in balance,so that the application of a party with protest procuratorial organs of public authority to collect the evidence,this is a rather controversial issue. Then,the Procuratorate in prosecutorial process could have been the Court finds that the facts of a case investigating evidence again？ Whether by taking new evidence raised a protest？ this article for the above issues of justification.