期刊文献+

宫颈液基薄层细胞学和组织病理学对照研究 被引量:7

Comparison of cervical ThinPrep cytology test and histopathology detection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨液基薄层细胞学(thinPrep cytologytest,TCT)筛查宫颈上皮内瘤变的价值。方法回顾性分析11 922例妇女(年龄范围为17~84岁)宫颈TCT检查结果 ,与宫颈活检和术后组织学比较分析。结果检出未明确诊断意义的非典型鳞状细胞(atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance,ASCUS)及以上病变共312例(2.62%),其中ASCUS173例,非典型鳞状细胞-不除外上皮内高度病变(atypical squamous cells-cannot excludeHSIL,ASC-H)12例,低度鳞状上皮内病变(low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion,LSIL)76例,高度鳞状上皮内病变(high-grade squamous intraepitheliallesion,HSIL)48例,鳞状细胞癌(squamous cell carcinoma,SCC)3例。157例进行宫颈活检组织病理学检查。其中59例ASCUS经组织病理学分别诊断为阴性17例(28.8%),HPV感染15例(25.4%),CINⅠ13例(22.0%),CINⅡ11例(18.6%),CINⅢ3例(5%)。LSIL、HSIL及SCC病例中与组织病理学一致率分别为35.2%(19/54)、67.7%(21/31)及100%(3/3)。HSIL组的组织学符合率高于LSIL组(x^2=8.38,P<0.01)。宫颈活检与术后病理结果一致率为75%(27/36)。结论 HSIL诊断与组织学有较高的符合率。ASCUS的诊断是TCT检查中的难点,其准确性对提高TCT诊断报告的水平具有重要意义。 Objective To evaluate ThinPrep cytology test (TCT) in diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Methods The results of thinprep cytology test from 11 922 patients (aged from 17 to 84) were analyzed retrospectively. And the data from cervical biopsies and surgical excision histology were compared. Results Three hundred and twenty-one positive cases with abnormal epithelial cells were diagnosed by TCT(2.62% ). Among the 312 cases, 173 cases were diagnosed with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), 12 cases with atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude HSIL(ASC-H), 76 cases with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), 48 cases with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and 3 cases with squamous cell carcinoma(SCC). However, only 157 of 321 cases were carried out cervical biopsy. The biopsy results from 59 cases with ASCUS showed that 17 cases (28.8%)were negative, 15 cases (25.4%) with human papilloma virus (HPV) infection, 13 cases (22.0%)with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Ⅰ ( CIN Ⅰ ), 11 cases (18.6%) with CIN Ⅱ and 3 cases (5%) with CIN Ⅲ. In comparison with TCT and cervical histology results, the rate of consistent results were 35.2% (19/54) for LSIL, 67.7% (21/31)for HSL, 100% (3/3) for SCC respectively. But HSIL with histology has higher consistency than that of LSIL with histology (X2--8.38,P〈0.01). The consistent diagnostic results from cervical biopsy and surgical excision was 75% (27/36). Conclusion Diagnosis of HSIL by TCT has a good consistent with cervical histology. But the diagnosis of ASCUS with TCT,is more difficult. Improving the accuracy diagnosis of ASCUS by TCT is an important way for clinical applications.
出处 《同济大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2010年第3期50-54,共5页 Journal of Tongji University(Medical Science)
关键词 液基薄层细胞学 宫颈上皮内瘤变 非典型鳞状细胞 鳞状上皮内病变 ThinPrep cytology test (TCT) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia atypical squamous cell squamous intraepithelial lesion
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献30

  • 1邢军,刘丽华.阴道镜诊断宫颈人乳头瘤病毒亚临床感染的应用价值[J].中国综合临床,2004,20(7):649-650. 被引量:6
  • 2魏丽惠.重视子宫颈病变中HPV的筛查[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2004,5(6):403-404. 被引量:31
  • 3宋学红.子宫颈电热圈环切术[J].现代妇产科进展,2006,15(2):157-160. 被引量:49
  • 4Weintraub J, Morabia A. Efficacy of a liquid-based thin layer method for cervical cancer screening in a population with a low incidence of cervical cancer. Diagn Cytopathol, 2000,22 ( 1 ) : 52- 59.
  • 5Carpenter AB, Davey DD. ThinPrep Pap Test: performance and biopsy follow-up in a university hospital. Cancer, 1999,87 (3): 105-112.
  • 6Cheung AN, Szeto EF, Leung BS, et al. Liquid-based cytology and conventional cervical smears:a comparison study in an Asian screening population. Cancer,2003,99 ( 6 ) : 331-335.
  • 7SolomnD,NayarR.子宫颈细胞学Bathesda报告系统:定义、标准和注释.黄受方,张长淮,余小蒙,译.2版.北京:诊断病理学杂志社,2004.
  • 8Limaye A, Connor AJ, Huang X. Comparative analysis of conventional Papanicalaou tests and a fluid-based thin-layer method. Arch Pathol Lab Med,2003,127(2) :200-204.
  • 9Wright TC,Cox JT,Massad LS,et al.2001 Consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervica1 cytological abnormalities[J].J Low Genit Tract Dis,2002,6(2):127-143.
  • 10Fambrini M,Penna C,Fallani MG,et al.Management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia:the role biopsy[J].Inter J Gynecol obstet,2003,82(2):219-220.

共引文献45

同被引文献56

引证文献7

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部