期刊文献+

64排螺旋CT结肠成像评价术前直肠癌分期 被引量:10

64-slice spiral CT colonography evaluation of the preoperative staging of rectal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨直肠癌术前行CT结肠成像(CTC)的临床价值。方法对37例确诊为直肠癌的患者行CTC检查,运用多种后处理方法显示病灶,根据改良Dukes分期法进行CT分期,并与术后病理对照。结果 64排螺旋CT检出全部直肠癌,敏感度为100%,Ⅰ期诊断准确率为89.19%,Ⅱ期为78.38%,Ⅲ期为72.97%,Ⅳ期为100%,总准确率为85.14%。结论 CTC检查对直肠癌术前分期有很高的价值,可以为临床提供更为确切的治疗依据。 Objective To assess the value of 64-slice spiral CT colonography(CTC)in patients with rectal cancer.Methods Thirty-seven patients with rectal cancer underwent 64-slice spiral CTC after bowel cleaning and rectal air insufflating,and the lesions were displayed with image postprocessing and staged according to modified Dukes stage.CT staging was compared with pathology staging of the tumors.Results The specificity of CT diagnosis was 100%.The accuracy rate of Ⅰ stage,Ⅱ stage,Ⅲ stage and Ⅳ stage of 64-slice spiral CT for rectal cancer was 89.19%,78.38%,72.97% and 100%,respectively.The total accuracy rate of CT staging was 85.14%.Conclusion CTC is of high value for staging of the rectal cancer,and can provide guidance for treatment.
出处 《中国介入影像与治疗学》 CSCD 2010年第4期439-442,共4页 Chinese Journal of Interventional Imaging and Therapy
基金 上海市科委2008年国际科技合作基金项目(08210707600)
关键词 直肠肿瘤 肿瘤分期 体层摄影术 X线计算机 Rectal neoplasms Neoplasm staging Tomography X-ray computed
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献94

共引文献214

同被引文献75

  • 1Ming Li Jin Gu.Changing patterns of colorectal cancer in China over a period of 20 years[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2005,11(30):4685-4688. 被引量:93
  • 2刘玉金,陈克敏,刘林祥,张秀美,朱建忠,董海朋,杨燕萍.低张水灌肠多层螺旋CT对大肠癌分期的临床研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2006,40(4):406-409. 被引量:24
  • 3高玲,余波,黄书亮.直肠癌CT诊断与分期[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2006,14(5):364-367. 被引量:14
  • 4王锡明,武乐斌,张云亭,柳澄.结肠癌64层螺旋CT增强表现及其病理对照研究[J].实用放射学杂志,2006,22(12):1459-1462. 被引量:22
  • 5蔡三军.结直肠肛管癌[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2005:247-248.
  • 6GUIMARAES L S, FLETCHER J G, HARMSEN W S, et al. Ap- propriate patient selection at abdominal dual - energy CT using 80 kV: relationship between patient size, image noise, and image quality [ J ]. Radiol, 2010, 257 (3) : 732 - 742.
  • 7KONDO H, KANEMATSU M, GOSHIMA S, et al. Body size inde- xes for optimizinglodine dose for aortic and hepatic enhancement at multidetector CT: comparison of total body weight, lean txMy weight, and bhxt volume[J]. Radiol, 2010, 254(1): 163- 169.
  • 8SCHINDERA S T, DIEDRICHSEN L, MII,LER H C, et al. Al- gorithm fbr abdominal multidetector CT at different tube voltages: assessment of diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose in a pbantmn study[J]. Radiol, 2011 , 260(2) : 454 -462.
  • 9SUN C H, FENG S T, XIAO P, et al. Quantitative assessment of peirect',d tumor itdihration with dynamic contrast -enhanced multi - detector row CT in rectal cancer[ J]. Eur J Radiol, 2011 , 80(2) : 279 - 283.
  • 10POMERRI F, PUCCIARELLI S, GENNARO G, et al. Compari- son between CT volume measurement and histopathological assess- mentor" response to neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer[ J]. Eur J Radiol, 2012, 81 (12) : 3918 -3924.

引证文献10

二级引证文献121

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部