期刊文献+

全球大陆7级浅源大地震强余震震级和空间分布特征 被引量:5

Magnitude and Distance Distribution Characteristics of Strong Aftershocks in Continents of the World
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文收集了1967—2007年全球大陆(不包括中国大陆)29次7.0~7.9级浅源大地震的余震资料。根据震源机制解结果把这29次地震序列分为走滑型和非走滑型,其中17次是走滑型,12次是非走滑型,并分别研究了走滑型和非走滑型地震序列强余震震级分布特征和空间分布特征。研究结果表明,强余震与主震震级差服从指数分布,统计得到了走滑型地震序列B值为0.58,非走滑型地震序列B值为1.07。走滑型地震序列强余震与主震距离的优势分布范围是10~45km,而非走滑型地震序列强余震与主震的距离优势分布为20~59km,并且强余震与主震震中距服从正态分布。 We collect data for 29 earthquake sequences with MS7.0~7.9 from 1966 to 2007 in the continents of world(except China continent),and then devide them into strike-slip or no-strike-slip earthquake sequences.Seventeen earthquake sequences are strike-slip type and twelve earthquake sequences are no-strike-slip type.We study the characteristics of the magnitude difference distribution between main shocks and their strong aftershocks;and then study the spatial distribution characteristics of strong aftershocks away from their main shocks of the 29 earthquake sequences.The result shows that the magnitude difference distribution obeys intercepted exponential distribution,the B value is 0.58 for the strike-slip type earthquake sequences and 1.07 for the no-strike-slip type earthquake sequences.While the spatial distribution of strong aftershocks obeys normal distribution,the dominated distribution area of strong shocks of the strike-slip type earthquake sequences is 10~45 km and no-strike-slip type earthquake sequences is 20~59 km.
出处 《地震》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期108-122,共15页 Earthquake
基金 中国地震局地震预测研究所基本科研业务经费(02077906和02092406)资助
关键词 全球大陆 地震序列 强余震 空间分布 震级分布 Continents of the world Earthquake sequences Strong shock Spatial distribution Magnitude distribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1吕晓健,高孟潭,高战武,米素婷.强余震和主震地面运动分布比较研究[J].地震学报,2007,29(3):295-301. 被引量:16
  • 2Engdhal E R,villasenor A.International handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology[J].2002,81A,ISBN:1-12-440652-1.
  • 3Bayasgalan,Jackson J A.A re-assessment of the faulting in the 1967Mogod earthquakes in Mongolia[J].Geophys J Int,1999,138(2):784-800.
  • 4Drakopoulos J C,Ekonomides A C.Aftershock of February 19,1968 earthquake in Northern Aegean Sea and related problems[J].Gageoph,1998,95(3):100-115.
  • 5Robert M,Hamilton.Time-term analysis of explosion data from the vicinity of the Borrego Mountain,California,Earthquake of 9 April 1968[J].Bull Seismol Soc Am,1970,60(2):367-381.
  • 6Stuart C.Aftershocks of the dash Baya Iran Earthquake of August[J].Bull Seismol Soc Am,1968,59(6):1 823-1 841.
  • 7James W,Dewey.Seismicity of Northern Anatolia[J].Bull Seismol Soc Am,1976,66(30):843-868.
  • 8Berberian M,Asudeh I,Bilham R G,et al.Mechanism of the main shock and aftershock study of the Tabas-E-Golshan(IRAN) earthquake of September 16,1978:A preliminary report[J].Bull Seismol Soc Am,1979,69(6):1 851-1 859.
  • 9Christopher D,Stephens,Jhon C,et al.Earthquake of February 28,1978:Region recording of aftershock and short-term,pre_earthquake seismicity[J].Bull Seismol Soc Am,1980,70(5):1 607-1 633.
  • 10Mansour N,Hiroo A.Source parameters of 1978 Tabas and 1979 Qainat,Iran,earthquakes from long-period surface waves[J].Bull Seismol Soc Am,1981,71(4):1 201-1 213.

二级参考文献83

共引文献119

同被引文献68

引证文献5

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部