期刊文献+

咽下综合征新生儿不同途径置管洗胃的效果分析 被引量:2

Effect Analysis on Catheter Gastrolavage via Different Pathways in Newborns with Swallowing Syndrome
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较咽下综合征新生儿经鼻与经口两种途径置管洗胃的效果。方法选择2007年1月至2009年5月转入某院新生儿重症监护室(newbornintensive care unit,NICU)的60例咽下综合征新生儿,按随机数字表法分为经鼻置管洗胃组(N=30)和经口置管洗胃组(N=30)。分析两种胃管置入方法的一次插管成功率及洗胃期间患儿恶心、面色发绀、呼吸暂停情况及置管前后SpO2的变化。同时,采用新生儿急性疼痛行为评分量表(douleur aigue nouveaune,DAN)评分标准,评价患儿疼痛情况。结果经口置管一次插管成功率为100%,高于经鼻置管的70%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。经口置管洗胃组患儿面色发绀、呼吸暂停发生情况及置管后SpO2下降程度与经鼻置管洗胃组比较,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05);经口置管洗胃组患儿DAN得分小于经鼻置管洗胃组患儿(P<0.05)。结论经口置管洗胃便于操作,对患儿各方面的影响较小,值得在临床中推广应用。 Objective To compare the effects of nasal and oral catheter gastrolavage in the newborns of NICU.Methods Sixty newborns with swallowing syndrome from January 2007 to May 2009 in the NICU were randomly divided into the nasal catheter gastrolavage group(n=30)and the oral catheter gastrolavage group(n=30).An analysis was conducted on the success rate of one-time intubation,occurrences of nausea,cyanosis and apnea during catheter gastolavage and the changes of SpO2 before and after indwelling catheter.The pain expressions of the newborns were evaluated with douleur aigue nouveaune(DAN)scoring standard.Results The success rate of one-time oral catheter(100%)was significantly higher than that(70%)of nasal one(P0.05).Significant differences were observed in occurrences of nausea,cyanosis and apnea during catheter gastolavage and the changes of SpO2 before and after indwelling catheter between the two groups(P0.05).The DAN scores of oral catheter gastrolavage group were lower than those of the nasal catheter gastrolavage group(P0.05).Conclusion Oral catheter gastrolavage is more flexible for the newborns with less influence,which deserves clinical popularization.
出处 《解放军护理杂志》 2010年第9期663-664,667,共3页 Nursing Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
关键词 新生儿 咽下综合征 洗胃 胃管置入途径 效果 newborn swallowing syndrome gastrolavage indwelling pathway of catheter effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献41

  • 1[1]Taddlo A, Katz J,Iierslch A, et al.Effect of neonatal circumcision on pain response during subsequent routine vaccination.Lancent ,1997,349:599-603.
  • 2[2]Chambers CT, Giesbrecht K, Craig KD, et al. A comparison of faces scales for the measurement of pediatric pain: children's and parents' ratings. Pain,1999 ,83:25-35.
  • 3[3]Finke W, Buttner W, Reckert S,et al. Respiratory and circulatory parameters as indicators of the postoperative analgesic demand in newborns and infants. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther, 1999 ,34:747-757.
  • 4[4]Butter W, Finke W. Analysis of behavioural and physiological parameters for the assessment of postoperative analgesic demand in newborns, infants and young children: a comprehensive report on seven consecutive studies. Paediatr Anaesth, 2000,10:303-318.
  • 5[5]Boelen-van der Loo WJ, Scheffer E, de Haan RJ,et al. Clinimetric evaluation of the Pain Observation Scale for Young Children in children aged between 1 and 4 years after ear, nose, and throat surgery. Develop Behavioral Pediatrics,1999,20: 222-227.
  • 6[6]Wilson GAM, Doyle E. Validation of three paediatric pain scores for use by parents.Anaesthesia,1996,51:1005-1007.
  • 7[7]Carbajal R, Paupe A, Hoenn E, et al.APN: evaluation behavioral scale of acute pain in newborn infants.Arch Pediatr,1997,4:623-628.
  • 8[8]Carbajal R, Chauvet X, Couderc S, et al.Randomised trial of analgesic effects of sucrose, glucose and pacifiers in term neonates. BMJ, 1999, 319: 1393-1397.
  • 9[9]Taddio A, Nulman I.A revised measure of acute pain in infants.J Pain Symptom Manage, 1995,10: 456-463.
  • 10[10]Schade JG, Joyce BA.Comparison of three preverbal scales for postoperative pain assessment in a diverse pediatric sample. J Pain Symptom Manage, 1996, 12: 348-359.

共引文献275

同被引文献26

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部