摘要
目的:对比观察丙泊酚辅助腰-硬联合麻醉和氯胺酮联合丙泊酚麻醉用于5~11岁患儿下腹部或腹部以下部位手术的临床疗效。方法:选择择期100例(ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级)5~11岁进行下腹部或腹部以下部位手术的患儿,随机分成为对照组(氯胺酮复合丙泊酚麻醉组,KP组)和实验组(丙泊酚辅助腰-硬联合麻醉组,CSEA组),各50例,观察麻醉前后平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、脉搏氧饱和度(SpO2)的变化以及氯胺酮和丙泊酚总用药量、术后清醒时间、术中及术后不良反应的发生率。结果:KP组与CSEA组MAP、HR、SpO2差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。与KP组相比,CSEA组氯胺酮和丙泊酚总用药量少、术后清醒时间短、术中及术后等不良反应发生率低(P〈0.05)。结论:丙泊酚辅助腰-硬联合麻醉用于小儿下腹部或腹部以下部位手术效果满意,呼吸循环稳定、术后清醒快、不良反应的发生率低。
Objective:To compare the clinical effects of propof aided combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and ketamine combined with propofol anesthesia in pediatric patients who undergoing operations below belly. Methods: 100 pediatric patients, aged 5 to 11,with ASA grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ, elective operations below belly were randomly allocated to either a conventional group (ketamine combined with propofol,group KP,n=50) or a experiment group (propofol aided Combined spinalepidural anesthesia, group CSEA,n=50).The variation of peri-anesthesia Mean arterial pressure(MAP) ,Heart rate(HR), Pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) were tested and recorded.The total dosage of propofol and ketamine, the wake time ,the perioperative incidence observed. Results: There were no significant difference of MAP、HR、SpO2 between in group CSEA and in group KP(P0.05). The wake time,the total dosage of propofol and ketamine, peri-operative incidence in group CSEA were remarkably shorter or lower than those in group PK(P0.05). Conclusion: With stable respiration and circulation maintenance, shorter wake time,peri-operative incidence in group CSEA has better clinical effect than those in group KP.
出处
《中国当代医药》
2010年第20期68-70,共3页
China Modern Medicine
关键词
腰-硬联合麻醉
丙泊酚
氯胺酮
小儿手术
Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia
Propofol
Ketamine
Pediatric operation