期刊文献+

旅游地居民环境保护支付意愿影响因素分析——以甘肃景泰黄河石林为例 被引量:4

Analysis on the Influencing Factors of Residents' WTP for Environmental Protection in the Tourist Destination
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在问卷调查的基础上,采用意愿调查价值评估法,调查了甘肃省景泰县龙湾村居民对黄河石林景区保护的支付意愿。结果表明,旅游开发对该地区居民所产生的社会、经济、文化影响较大,当地居民对此感知明显,并表现出积极的态度。同时,当地居民愿意为促进旅游区的发展提供一定的劳动力或费用,这与发达国家旅游地社区居民态度明显不同。这在一定程度上反映出发展中国家旅游发展的特点。居民人口统计学的差异对WTP及WTP值的影响不大,这与国内其他关于环境保护中居民支付意愿调查的结果不同,生活水平提高与居民的环境保护意识是影响居民进行支付的主要原因,支付费用的大小除了与生活水平提高相关,还与当地生态环境遭到破坏有显著的相关性。 On the basis of questionnaire survey,the influence factors of residents' willingness to pay for environmental protection for Hoodoo National Geopark of the Yellow Rive in Jingtai of Gansu Province were explored.The results showed that tourism development had greatly influenced local society,economy and culture.Residents had a strong awareness of all the factors above mentioned and showed a positive attitude.Local residents would definitely like to provide a certain degree of labor or money to promote the development of tourism,which was different from that of developed countries.To some extent this reflects the characteristics of tourism development in developing countries.However,the result of this paper that demographic statistics among the residents had little effect on the WTP also differ from previous researches.The reasons for this were that the higher living standards and the environmental consciousness of the residents were the main influencing elements to pay.How much to pay for protecting environment was highly related to the improved living standards of local people and the destruction degree of the local ecological environment.
作者 王蕾 魏宝祥
出处 《安徽农业科学》 CAS 北大核心 2010年第16期8723-8725,8765,共4页 Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金(50879033)资助
关键词 支付意愿 影响因素 环境意识 黄河石林 Willingness to pay(WTP) Influencing factor Environmental consciousness Hoodoo National Geopark of the Yellow River
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1BISHOP R C,HEBERLEIN T A.Measuring values of extra-market goods:are indirect methods biased[J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1981,66(3):926-930.
  • 2CARSON R T,FLORES N E,MEADE N F.Contingent Valuation:Controversies and Evidence[J].Environmental and Re-source Economics,2001,19:17-210.
  • 3LOOMIS J B.Contingent valuation methodology and the US institutional framework[C]// BATEMAN I J,WILLIS K G.Valuing Environmental Preferences:Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US,EU and Developing Countries.New York:Oxford University Press,1999:613-627.
  • 4BONNIEUX F,RAINELLI P.Contingent valuation methodology and the EU institutional framework In[C]// BATEMAN I J,WILLIS K G.Valuing Environmental Preferences:Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US,EU,and Developing Countries.New York:Oxford University Press,1999:585-612.
  • 5JOHN L,PAULAA K.Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin:results from a contingent valuation survey[J].Ecological Economics,2000,33:103-117.
  • 6BARRY D S,CRISTI M C,KATHLEEN E H.The Florida manatee and eco-tourism:toward a safe minimum standard[J].Ecological Economics,2004,50:101-115.
  • 7CARLSSON F,JOHANSSON S O.Willingness to pay for improved air quality in Sweden[J].Applied Economics,2000,32(6):661-669.
  • 8梁爽,姜楠,谷树忠.城市水源地农户环境保护支付意愿及其影响因素分析——以首都水源地密云为例[J].中国农村经济,2005(2):55-60. 被引量:75
  • 9李莹,白墨,张巍,杨开忠,王学军.改善北京市大气环境质量中居民支付意愿的影响因素分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2002,12(6):125-128. 被引量:29
  • 10蔡志坚,张巍巍.南京市公众对长江水质改善的支付意愿及支付方式的调查[J].生态经济,2007,23(2):116-119. 被引量:25

二级参考文献34

  • 1梁爽,姜楠,谷树忠.城市水源地农户环境保护支付意愿及其影响因素分析——以首都水源地密云为例[J].中国农村经济,2005(2):55-60. 被引量:75
  • 2赵磊,邓维,朱继业,陆根法,孔维玮.太湖流域农村公众环境意识案例研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2005,14(3):272-276. 被引量:32
  • 3梁勇,成升魁,闵庆文,马冬梅.居民对改善城市水环境支付意愿的研究[J].水利学报,2005,36(5):613-617. 被引量:43
  • 4杜亚平.改善东湖水质的经济分析[J].生态经济,1996,12(6):15-20. 被引量:19
  • 5Mitchell R C, Carson R T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method[M]. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 1989.
  • 6Richard C B, Patricia A C, Daniel J M. Contingent Valuation[A]. In: Daniel W Bromley. The Handbook of Environmental Economics[C]. US: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 1995. 629-654.
  • 7Day B, Mourato S. Willingness to pay for water quality improvements in Chinese rivers: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey in the Beijing Area[A]. In: United Nations CSERGE Working Paper 98-01,Center for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment[C]. 1998.
  • 8Arrow K, Solow R, Leamer E, et al. Report of NOAA Panel on contingent valuations[A]. In: US Federal Register[C]. 1993, 10: 4 601-4 614.
  • 9Carlsson F, Johansson-Stenman O. Willingness to pay for improved air quality in Sweden[J]. Applied Economics, 2000, 32 (6): 661-669.
  • 10密云县人民政府.《密云县生态示范区建设总体规划》[Z].,2002年..

共引文献219

同被引文献15

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部