期刊文献+

基于H_2S毒性负荷的山区含硫气井应急计划区的划分方法 被引量:8

Approach to evaluate emergency planning zones for the sour gas wells in the mountain areas of China based on H_2S toxic load
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究山区含硫气井应急计划区划分方法,为制订其安全生产标准提供科学依据。选择典型山区地形的3口含硫气井,采用大涡模拟方法,模拟了不同H2S释放速率、不同风速和风向、不同井喷点火时间的组合条件下H2S在大气中的扩散浓度场。用积分方法计算了各井H2S毒性负荷的时空分布,研究了H2S毒性负荷与H2S释放速率之间的关系,建立了以H2S释放速率为指标的山区含硫气井应急计划区的划分方法。结果表明,本次分析所用的591口H2S释放速率大于零的川渝地区含硫气井中,16.75%的含硫气井应急计划区半径大于公众安全防护距离。对于中国主要含硫气井集中分布在人口密集的川渝地区的实际情况而言,该方法是比较适用且可行的。 The approach to evaluate emergency planning zones for the sour gas wells in the mountain areas of China is established to offer scientific basis for planning industry safety standard.The concentration fields of H2S dispersion in three sour gas wells at the typical mountain terrain were simulated by the large eddy simulation method under the conditions of different H2S release rates,ignition time for the wells out of control,various wind directions and wind speed.Furthermore,the temporal and spatial distributions of H2S toxic load were calculated with the integral calculation method.The relationships between H2S toxic load and H2S release rates of the sour gas wells were discussed.The method for determining emergency planning zone of sour gas wells in the mountain areas was presented,taking H2S release rate as an indicator.The results show that the emergency planning zones of 16.75 percent of 591 sour gas wells in Sichuan and Chongqing area are greater than the public safety protection distance in this research.This approach is more applicable and feasible for the most of sour gas wells in Sichuan and Chongqing area.
出处 《石油学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第4期668-671,675,共5页 Acta Petrolei Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(No.70833006) 国家自然科学基金重大研究计划(No.90924303) 国家"十一五"科技支撑计划项目(2006BAK04B04 2008BAB37B05) 国家高技术研究发展计划(863)项目(2007AA04Z250)联合资助
关键词 川渝地区 含硫气井 硫化氢扩散 释放速率 毒性负荷 应急计划区 大涡模拟方法 Sichuan and Chongqing areas sour gas wells hydrogen sulfide dispersion release rate toxic load emergency planning zone large eddy simulation method
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1戴金星,胡见义,贾承造,方义生,孙志道,魏伶华,袁进平,杨威.科学安全勘探开发高硫化氢天然气田的建议[J].石油勘探与开发,2004,31(2):1-4. 被引量:149
  • 2罗音宇,江田汉,邓云峰,席学军,伍彬彬.含硫气井硫化氢扩散危险水平分级方法[J].石油学报,2008,29(3):447-450. 被引量:14
  • 3席学军,邓云峰.井喷硫化氢扩散分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2007,3(4):20-24. 被引量:50
  • 4陈建国 刘奕 杨锐.有害气体泄露过程的数值模拟.应用基础与工程科学学报,2006,14:212-218.
  • 5姜传胜,邓云峰,席学军.高含硫气井周边居民疏散安全分析方法[J].中国安全科学学报,2007,17(9):9-13. 被引量:18
  • 6Alberta Energy and Utilities Board.Directive 071:Emergency preparedness and response requirements for the upstream petroleum industry (formerly Guide 71)[EB/OL].(2003-06)[2009-02-10].http://www.ercb.ca/docs/documents/directives/Directive071_2005.pdf.
  • 7Mazzola C A,Addis R P.Atmospheric dispersion modeling resources(Second Edition)[M].Washington,D.C.:United States Department of Energy,1995:172-173.
  • 8Ermak D L.User's manual for SLAB:An atmospheric dispersion model for denser-than-air releases(UCRL-MA-105607)[M].Berkeley:University of California,1990:1-67.
  • 9Havens J.A dispersion model for elevated dense gas jet chemical releases (Volume Ⅰ)[M/OL].North Carolina:U.S.Environmental Protection Agency,1988[2010-01-19].http://www.epa.gov/scram001/userg/other/degugv1.pdf.
  • 10Jameson A,Schmidt W,Turkel E.Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge-kutta time-stepping schemes[C/OL] / /AIAA 14th Fluid and Plasma Dynamic Conference,Palo Alto,California,June 23-25,1981[2010-01-19].http://aero-comlab.stanford.edu/Papers/jameson.aiaa.1981-1259.pdf.

二级参考文献41

共引文献207

同被引文献82

引证文献8

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部