期刊文献+

两种途径广泛性子宫切除术对比分析 被引量:5

Modified Radical Hysterectomy and Radical Hysterectomy:A Retrospective Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的回顾性分析改良广泛性子宫切除术和传统的广泛性子宫切除术对宫颈癌患者的治疗效果。方法选择2008年2月~2010年3月间在安庆市立医院接受手术治疗的患者共42例,其中接受两种手术方式的患者均为21例,接受改良广泛性子宫切除术的患者为Ⅰa~Ⅱb期宫颈癌;接受传统广泛性子宫切除术的患者为Ⅰb1~Ⅱb期宫颈癌。比较上述两种方式手术时间、术后住院时间、术中出血量和围手术期并发症的发生情况。结果平均手术时间、术中出血量改良组和传统组分别为(304±11)min、(935±75)mL和(357±1)min、(1331±494)mL,二者分别比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后平均导尿管留置时间、术后住院时间、术后尿潴留、输尿管损伤和淋巴囊肿的发生率,两组分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论改良广泛性子宫切除术安全可行,能有效缩短手术时间及减少术中出血量。 Objective To compare modified radical hysterectomy (MRH) with radical hysterectomy (RH) for cervical cancer patients in terms of perioperative complications. Methods Fifty two consecutive patients with cervical cancer underwent RH (n=21) or MRH (n=21) from February 2008 to March 2010 at Anqing Hospital. The operative time, blood loss during the operation and the perioperative complications between two methods were assessed. Results Compared with patients received RH,patients underwent MRH had shorter operative time (304 ± 11 vs.357 ± lmin,P〈0.05) and less blood loss during the operation (935 ± 75 vs. 1331± 494mL,P〈0.05). However, there were no significant difference in terms of the perioperative complications (P〉0.05) and hospital stay (P〉0.05). Conclusion MRH is safe and feasible surgical management for cervical cancer patients,which would reduced the operative time and blood loss during the operation.
出处 《中国现代医生》 2010年第19期130-131,共2页 China Modern Doctor
关键词 子宫切除术 宫颈肿瘤 改良 Hysterectomy Cervix neoplasm Modified
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1傅才英,吴佩煜,翁霞云,等.妇产科手术学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2004:320-326.
  • 2耿毅.宫颈癌手术百年发展历程[J].肿瘤学杂志,2004,10(5):289-292. 被引量:14
  • 3Frumovitz M, Sun CC, Schmeler KM, et al. Parametrial Involvement in radical hysterectomy specimens for women with early-stage cervical cancer[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2009,114( 1 ) : 93 - 99.
  • 4Nevin J, Luesley D, Chan K, et al. Meeting the challenge of developing and maintaining radical hysterectomy skills[J]. BJOG,2010, 117(1):1-4.

共引文献17

同被引文献35

  • 1王敏,高山,朱楠,孙颖,张忠福,陆景明,郭文芬.非脱垂子宫阴式切除术31例临床分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2005,21(3):185-186. 被引量:41
  • 2伍凤莉,罗立华,申桂华,郎璐荣.阴式子宫切除术适应证及并发症探讨[J].实用妇产科杂志,2005,21(7):439-440. 被引量:75
  • 3罗新.阴式子宫手术的历史地位及现实地位[J].实用妇产科杂志,2007,23(1):1-3. 被引量:66
  • 4乐杰.妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:89.
  • 5苏应宽,刘新民.妇产科手术学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:882-883.
  • 6Voogt MJ,De Vries J,Fonteijn W,et al.Sexual functioning and psychological well-being after uterine artery embolization in women with symptomatic uterine fibroids.Fertil Steril,2009,92(2):756-761.
  • 7Ray G,Jayne F,Su M,et al.The evaluate study:two parallelrandomised trials,one comparing laparoscopic with abdominalhysterectomy,the other comparin glaparoscopic with vaginalhysterectomy.BMJ,2004,3(28):129-133.
  • 8Johnson N,Barlow D,Lethaby A,et al.Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.Cochrane Syst Rev,2005,25(2):176-178.
  • 9Kovac SR,Barhan S,Lister M,et al.Guidelines for the selection of the route of hysterectomy:application in a resident clinic population.Am J Obstet Gynecol,2002,187(6):1521-1527.
  • 10王晓芳,张平宁,高桂琴,等.妇产科手术学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2012:108-109.

引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部