期刊文献+

奥氮平与利培酮治疗难治性精神分裂症的对照研究 被引量:43

A comparative study of olanzapine and risperidone in treating patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 比较奥氮平与利培酮对难治性精神分裂症的疗效及安全性.方法 68例难治性精神分裂症患者按照排列表法随机分为奥氮平组[34例,(24.1±5.4)mg/d]和利培酮组[34例,(7.9±1.8)mg/d],疗程均为12周.采用阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)、临床总体印象量表(CGI)及治疗中需处理的不良反应症状量表(TESS),在治疗前及治疗第1,2,4,8,12周末分别评定疗效和不良反应.结果 (1)奥氮平组PANSS总分、阳性症状分、阴性症状分及一般病理分均从治疗第2周末起较治疗前下降(P〈0.05~0.01) 利培酮组PANSS总分、阳性症状分、一般病理分从治疗第2周末起,阴性症状分从第4周末起,较治疗前下降(P〈0.05~0.01) 奥氮平组从治疗第2周末起各时点PANSS总分、阴性症状分均低于利培酮组(P〈0.05~0.01).(2)治疗第2周末起,2组临床总体印象量表-严重程度和改善程度(CGI-SI)总分均较治疗前下降(P〈0.05~0.01) 2组间各时点CGI-SI分的差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05).(3)治疗第12周末,奥氮平组、利培酮组临床总有效率分别为65%、41%,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05).(4)奥氮平组、利培酮组不良反应发生率分别为53%(18/34)和59%(20/34),差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05) 奥氮平组体质量增加发生率高于利培酮组(P〈0.05) 利培酮组静坐不能、异常泌乳和(或)闭经、肌张力增高的发生率高于奥氮平组(P〈0.05).结论 奥氮平对难治性精神分裂症有良好疗效,不良反应轻微. Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of olanzapine and risperidone in treatment of treatment-resistant schizophrenia.Methods A total of 68 patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia were randomly assigned to olanzapine group and risperidone group, and received olanzapine or risperidone treatment for 12 weeks respectively.The efficacy and adverse events were assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale(TESS) at week 0 and 1,2,4,8,12.Results The PANSS scores in both groups decreased significantly after treatment (P〈 0.05-0.01).The PANSS total score and negative syndrome score in olanzapine group were significant lower than that in risperidone group at each time point from 2nd weekend after treatment (P〈0.05 - 0.01 ).The CGI-SI score in both groups decreased significantly after treatment ( P 〈 0.05 - 0.01 ).The differences in CGI-SI score at each time point in both groups were not significant (P〉0.05).The response rate was higher in olanzapine group than risperidone group ( P〈0.05).There were similar rates of side effects between both groups(P〉0.05), with olanzapine being associated with more weight gain, and risperidone with more akathisia, abnormal lactation and/or menostasia,hypermyotonia.Conclusion The results suggest olanzapine be of good efficacy and less side effects in the treatment of treatment-resistant schizophrenia in comparison with risperidone.
出处 《中华精神科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第1期24-27,共4页 Chinese Journal of Psychiatry
关键词 利哌立酮 治疗结果 安全 精神分裂症 奥氮平 Risperidone Treatment outcome Safety Schizophrenia Olanzapine
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Kane JM.Treatment-resistant schizophrenic patients.J Clin Psychiatry,1996,57 (9 Suppl):35-40.
  • 2Carpenter WT,Buchanan RW.Lessons to take home from CATIE.Psychiatr Serv,2008,59:523-525.
  • 3Breier A,Hamilton SH.Comparative efficacy of olanzapine and haloperidol for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia.Biol Psychiatry,1999,45:403-411.
  • 4成秀芳,石夏明,张艳萍,王绍礼,朱秀英,韩笑乐.利培酮治疗难治性精神分裂症临床分析[J].临床精神医学杂志,2000,10(6):342-344. 被引量:30
  • 5汪志良,金卫东.难治性精神分裂症概念、类型及其治疗策略的认识[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2005,31(5). 被引量:39
  • 6Brodaty H,Low LF.Aggression in the elderly.J Clin Psychiatry,2003,64(4 Suppl):36-43.
  • 7Rosenheck R,Perlick D,Bingham S,et al.Effectiveness and cost of olanzapine and haloperidol in the treatment of schizophrenia:a randomized controlled trial.JAMA,2003,290:2693-2702.
  • 8Lieberman JA,Stroup TS,McEvoy JP,et al.Effiectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia.N Engl J Med,2005,353:1209-1223.
  • 9张红霞,江开达,沈晓玲,唐文忠,杨晓敏.奥氮平治疗首发精神分裂症1年随访[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2007,33(8):459-462. 被引量:34
  • 10唐茂芹,胡志芳,苗春辉,米国林,高小妹,苏磊.奥氮平治疗难治性精神分裂症疗效分析[J].山东医药,2003,43(19):28-28. 被引量:8

二级参考文献36

共引文献135

同被引文献317

引证文献43

二级引证文献227

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部