期刊文献+

扩散加权成像中不同扩散敏感系数对乳腺病变的诊断价值 被引量:33

The Study of DWI in Diagnosis of Breast Lesions with Differernt Bvalues
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究扩散加权成像(DWI)中不同扩散敏感系数(b值)对乳腺病变的诊断价值及影响因素,并探讨其鉴别良、恶性乳腺肿瘤的最佳界值。资料与方法对155例患者行不同b值的DWI检查,其中136例选取b值(0,500s/mm2),122例选取b值为(0,1000s/mm2)。所有病例结果均经手术病理证实,将DWI表现与组织病理学进行对照。结果两组b值中恶性病变的ADC值均明显低于良性病变,且乳腺良、恶性病变的表观扩散系数(ADC)值均随b值增大而降低。采用非参数法受试者操作特性曲线(ROC)统计学分析方法确定鉴别良、恶性病变的最佳界值,应用此界值对乳腺病变诊断的敏感性和特异性分别为83.3%和56.9%(b=500s/mm2)、73.6%和80.0%(b=1000s/mm2)。结论高b值DWI对乳腺病变诊断的特异性高于低b值DWI,是乳腺动态增强成像检查的一个有益的补充。 Objective To evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of diffusion weighted imaging(DWI) with different b values,and to investigate the best cutoff value for differentiating benign from malignant lesions.Materials and Methods 155 cases with breast lesions underwent MR examinations.136 focal masses with b value of 0 and 500 s/mm2,and 122 with value of 0 and b 1000 s/mm2 by single-shot EPI sequence were performed.The average apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC),sensitivity,specificity and cutoff ADC value of DWI to distinguish malignant lesions were calculated seprately.Results The average ADC value of malignant lesions was lower than benign lesions,moreover the average ADC value was decreased with increased b value.The ROC curves were generated in order to determine the ADC thresholds that could balance the needs of sensitivity and specificity.We selected the ADC cutoff value of 1.11 × 10-3 mm2 /s mm2 /s for b = 1000 s/mm2 and 1.57 × 10-3 mm2 /s mm2 /s for b = 500 s/mm2.At the cutoff values,the sensitivity and specificity were 73.6% and 80.0% for b = 1000 s/mm2 and 83.3% and 56.9% for b = 500 s/mm2.Conclusion DWI with high bvalue has better spcificity than with low b value and can supplement DCE imaging findings to improve the accuracy of diagnosis.
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第7期892-896,共5页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
关键词 乳腺 扩散加权成像 诊断 Breast Diffusion weighted imaging Diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献25

  • 1赵斌,蔡世峰,高佩虹,彭洪娟.MR扩散加权成像鉴别乳腺良恶性病变的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(5):497-500. 被引量:146
  • 2娄路馨,彰俊杰,时高峰.MR扩散加权成像对乳腺良恶性疾病的应用研究[J].临床放射学杂志,2007,26(4):350-353. 被引量:45
  • 3Moseley ME, Sevick R, Wendland ME, et al. ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging diffusion and perfusion. Can Assoc Rasiol J 1991, 42:31-38.
  • 4Melhem ER, Itoh R, Jones L, et al. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the brain: effect of diffusion weighting on the trace and anisotropy measurements. AJNR 2000, 21: 1813-1820.
  • 5Niendorf T, Dijkhuizen RM, Norris DG, et al. Biexponential diffusion attenuation in various stages of brain tissues: implications for diffusion-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996,36:847 -857.
  • 6Assaf Y, Cohen Y. Non-mono-exponential attenuation of water and N- acetyl aspartae signals due to diffusion in brain tissue. J Magn Reson 1998, 131: 69-85.
  • 7Yashiura T, Wu O, Zaheer A, et al. Highly diffusion- sensitized MRI of brain: dissociation of gray and white matter.Magn Reson Med 2001, 45: 734-740.
  • 8Fowler PA , Casey CE, Cameron GC, et al.Cyclic changes in composition and volume of the breast during the menstrual cycle, measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1990,97:595-602.
  • 9Hussain Z, Roberts N, Whitehouse GH, et al. Estimation of breast volme and its variation during the menstrual cycle using MRI and stereology. Br J Radiol, 1999,72:236-245.
  • 10Savannah, Partridge, Graeme,et al. Menstrual cycle variation of apparent diffusion coefficients measured in the normal breast using MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging,2001,14:433-438.

共引文献231

同被引文献259

引证文献33

二级引证文献299

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部