期刊文献+

中国内外资企业TFP增长及其影响因素的对比研究——基于35个工业行业面板数据的实证分析 被引量:1

The Comparative Study of TFP Growth and Its Determinants between Domestic Enterprises and Foreign Venture Enterprises in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文运用DEA-Malmquist生产率指数法测算了2000~2007年我国内外资企业35个行业的全要素生产率(TFP)及其分解指标,在对比分析的基础上,分别对内外资企业各项效率指标的影响因素进行了实证检验。结果发现,在资源和劳动密集型行业中,内资企业的各项效率指标均明显高于外资企业,在资本和技术密集型行业中,二者则相差无几;2004年后,技术效率对内资企业的TFP增长平均贡献达到44.5%,外资企业的TFP增长中技术进步的贡献一直在80%左右。回归结果显示,各因素对内外资企业TFP增长的影响方向和程度表现出显著差异。最后,本文给出了提高内资企业生产率增长的政策建议。 This paper empirically examines the total factor productivity of China's 35 industries from 2000 to 2007 by exploring DEA-Malmquist model. Based on a comparative analysis, we try to explore the determinants of TFP growth between the domestic and foreign enterprises. We find the labor/resource-intensive industries' TFP and decomposed indexes of domestic enterprises are apparently higher than foreign ones, however, the difference of the capital/technology-intensive industries is negligible. Aider 2004, technical efficiency accounts 44.5% of TFP growth in domestic industries, and the contribution of technical progress to TFP growth of foreign enterprises always average out at 80% or so. The influence of determinants on TFP and decomposed indexes have much difference between domestic and foreign enterprises. Finally, we provide some policy applications for improving the efficiency of domestic enterprises.
作者 张公嵬 梁琦
出处 《中大管理研究》 2010年第2期1-25,共25页 China Management Studies
基金 国家社科基金重点项目(编号:07AJY012)的阶段性成果
关键词 全要素生产率 技术进步 技术效率 曼奎斯特指数 数据包络分析 TFP, technical progress, technical efficiency, malmquist index, DEA
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献293

共引文献3974

同被引文献13

  • 1Baily, M.N., C. Hulten, D. CamPbell.1992.Productivity Dynamics in Manufacturing Plants[J].Microeconomics(4):187-267.
  • 2Bartelsman, E.J, J. Haltiwanger and S. Scarpetta. 2004. Microeconomic Evidence of Creative Destruction in Industrial and Developing Countries,Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers No. 114/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  • 3Carlo Altomonte and Italo Colantone. 2008:Firm Heterogeneity and Endogenous Regional Disparities[J].Journal of Economic Geography.
  • 4Chen, Kuan, Jefferson, Gary H., Rawski, Thomas G., Wang, Hongchang, and Zheng,Yuxin. 1998. New Estimates of Fixed Investment and Capital Stock for Chinese State Industry.China Quarterly, 114.
  • 5Dunne, T., Roberts, M.J., Sarnuelson, L.1988.Patterns of Firm Entry and Exit In US Manufacturing Industries, The RAND Journal of Economics 19(4):495-515.
  • 6J levinsohn and A Petrin.2003.Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables[J].Review of Economic Studies ( 70 ) :317-341.
  • 7Kumar, S. and R.R. Russell .2002.Technological Change, Technological Catch-Up, and Capital Deepening:Relative Contributions to Growth and Convergence, American Economic Review, (92): 527-548.
  • 8Petri Bockermana, Mika Maliranta.2007.The micro-level dynamics of regional productivity growth: The source of divergence in Finland[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics.37(2): 165-182.
  • 9Tybout,James R. and Daniel Westbrook.1995.Trade Liberalization and the Dimensions of Efficiency Change in Mexican Manufacturing Industries.Journal of Intemational Economies 39(1-2):53-78.
  • 10李玉红,王皓,郑玉歆.企业演化:中国工业生产率增长的重要途径[J].经济研究,2008(6):12-24. 被引量:200

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部