期刊文献+

新增建设用地管理的“配额—交易”模型——与排污权交易制度的对比研究 被引量:20

The Cap-and-trade Model of Incremental Construction Land Quota:An Analog with the Emission Permits System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过排污权交易与新增建设用地指标管理的对比研究,探索我国现行新增建设用地指令性管理的改进方向。对比研究结果表明,由于排污权和新增建设用地指标在实行总量控制、具有经济价值、单位配额的产出不同等三个方面具有相似性,在实行新增建设用地指标总量控制的框架内引入类似排污权交易的市场机制,就有可能成为今后我国新增建设用地指令性管理体制改革的选择方向。同时,进一步的理论证明也显示,引入新增建设用地指标的市场交易机制,可以实现农地非农化配置的帕累托改进。在此基础上,立足排污权交易和新增用地指标管理的差异性,借鉴我国地方政府新增建设用地管理的市场取向创新经验,参照国外排污权交易管理的"配额-交易"模式,建立了中国新增建设用地指标交易的一个理论模型,并阐述了其政策涵义,即目前可在设区的市的范围内,允许其辖区内的市、县基层政府之间进行新增建设用地指标交易,通过适当的交易能实现新增建设用地的市场价值以及全社会福利的最优。 The purpose of this paper is to explore improvement of mechanism of the current allocation of incremental construction land quota in China through the analog of emission permits system and the quota itself. The results indicate that, since incremental construction land quota and emission permits are similar in the control of the overall quota, economic value and different marginal output of the quota, it could be a possible orientation for China to improve its commanding land administration system. Further study shows that a Pareto improvement can be realized through the transaction of the quota in the market during the process of land conversion. Based on the above analysis, the authors propose a theoretical model of the transaction of incremental construction land quota in China, which not only wares the differences between emission permits and incremental construction land quota, but also refers to the experience of the quota administration in China and the Capeand-trade model of emission permits abroad. The implication of the model is to permit transaction of incremental construction land quota among different jurisdictions so as to realize the value of the quota and the optimal welfare of the whole society as well.
出处 《中国人口·资源与环境》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第7期86-91,共6页 China Population,Resources and Environment
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(No.70773102)资助
关键词 分区管制 排污权交易 新增建设用地配额 zoning emission permits incremental construction land quota
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Hui Wang,Ran Tao,Juer Tong.Trading Land Development Rights under a Planned Land Use System:The“Zhejiang Model”[J].China & World Economy,2009,17(1):66-82. 被引量:10
  • 2J H Dales.Land,Water and Ownership[J].Canadian Journal of Economics,1968,1(4):791-804.
  • 3David W Montgomery.Markets in Licenses and Efficient Pollution Control Programs[J].Journal of Economic Theory,1972,5(3):395-418.
  • 4Maureen L Cropper,Wallace E Oates.Environmental Economics:A Survey[J].Journal of Economic Literature,1992,30(2):675-740.
  • 5托马斯·思德纳.环境与自然资源管理的政策工具[M].张蔚文,黄祖辉,译.上海:三联书店,上海人民出版社,2005:130.
  • 6Thoms H Tietenberg.Transferable Discharge Permits and the Control of Stationary Source Air Pollution:A Survey and Synthesis[J].Land Economics,1980,56(4):391-416.
  • 7Robert W Hahn.Economic Prescriptions for Environmental Problems:How the Patient Followed the Doctor's Orders[J].The Journal of Economic Perspectives,1989,3(2):95-114.
  • 8Bonnie G Colby.cap-and-Trade Policy Challenges:A Tale of Three Markets[J].Land Economics,2000,76(4):638-658.
  • 9Donald N Dewees.Emissions Trading:ERCs or Allowances?[J].Land Economics,2001,77(4):513-526.
  • 10靳相木.新增建设用地指令性配额管理的市场取向改进[J].中国土地科学,2009,23(3):19-23. 被引量:45

二级参考文献15

共引文献53

同被引文献311

引证文献20

二级引证文献114

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部