摘要
目的:探讨CT、MRI、BAEP对脑干病变诊断的敏感性及BAEP与脑干病损严重程度和预后的关系。方法:对32例脑干病变的患者同时进行了CT、MRI及BAEP检查,并对患者进行格拉斯哥昏迷计分(GCS)及神经功能缺损评分(SSS)。根据BAEP异常情况分为3组:Ⅰ组:BAEP正常组;Ⅱ组:BAEP异常或双侧不对称,但各波存在;Ⅲ组:除Ⅰ波外,其余各波消失。病后3月对患者进行预后评价。结果:脑干病变CT阳性率5313%,MRI阳性率9062%,BAEP阳性率3438%。MRI及BAEP阳性率高于头颅CT,有显著性差异,P<005。Ⅰ组及Ⅱ组患者GCS计分高于Ⅲ组,SSS评分低于Ⅲ组。Ⅲ组患者全部预后不良,与Ⅰ组及Ⅱ组比较有显著差异,P<005。结论:对脑干病变MRI和BAEP阳性率较高,若同时进行MRI和BAEP检查达100%;BAEP是判断脑干病变严重程度及预后较为可靠的指标。
Objective:To explore the sensitivity of CT,MRI and BAEP on brain stem diseases and the relationship among BAEPS,degree of brain stem injury and prognosis.Methods:The CT,MRI and BAEP were examined in 32 patient with brain stem diseases.The GCS Score and SSS score were performed on all patients.Basis on BAEPS,the patients were divided into three groups:group Ⅰ:normal BAEPS;group Ⅱ:abnormal BAEPS or asymmetrical BAEPS,but without any ware was missing,and group Ⅲ:all waves were disappeared besides wave Ⅰ.Results:The positive rate of CT,MRI,BAEPS was 53 13%,90 62%,84 38%,respectivily.The positive rate of MRI and BAEPS was significantly higher than that of CT( P <0 05).The GCS score of group Ⅰ and Ⅱ was higher than that of group Ⅲ,The SSS score of group Ⅰ and group Ⅱ was lower than that of group Ⅲ.All patients in group Ⅲ had a poor prognosis.Conclusion:The sensitivity of MRI or BAEPS was higher in patients with brain stem diseases.The sensitivity was 100% if both MRI and BAEP were performed.BAEPS were an important index reflecting the degree of brain stem injury and its prognosis.
出处
《华西医学》
CAS
1999年第1期29-30,共2页
West China Medical Journal
关键词
脑干病变
听觉诱发电位
CT
NMR
brain stem disease
brainstem auditory evoked potentials(BAEP)
CT
MRI