摘要
目的:通过对植入起搏器患者的随访,了解心房自动阈值管理功能的可靠性和安全性。方法:选择植入Medtronic Enpulse双腔起搏器的患者43例,于植入起搏器后的1、3、6个月分别程控随访,用人工测定法和自动测定法测定起搏器的心房输出阈值、感知和导线阻抗。结果:植入起搏器1、3、6个月后,随访时人工测定和自动测定的心房输出阈值分别为(0.60±0.26)V与(0.60±0.23)V、(0.55±0.19)V与(0.56±0.18)V、(0.58±0.20)V与(0.59±0.21)V,差异无统计学意义;且心房感知度和导线阻抗的人工测定与自动测定间无差异。在心房自动起搏阈值测定过程中未诱发任何心律失常。结论:起搏器的心房自动阈值管理功能的临床应用是可靠和安全的。
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of atrial capture management (ACM) of EnPulse pacemaker. Methods Forty-three patients with an indication for pacemaker were implanted with Medtronic EnPulse pacemaker. ACM and manually measured atrial pacing thresholds, sensory level, and lead impedance were performed at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months follow up after implantation. Results There were no statistical significant differences in atrial pacing threshoIds[(0.60±0.26)V vs (0.60±0.23)V, (0.55±0.19)V vs (0.56±0.18)V, (0.58±0.20)V vs (0.59±0.21)V], sensory level, and lead impedance at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months follow up after implantation tested by ACM and manual measures. No atrial aiThythmias were observed during ACM test. Conclusions ACM of EnPulse pacemaker is safe and reliable.
出处
《内科理论与实践》
2010年第4期323-325,共3页
Journal of Internal Medicine Concepts & Practice
关键词
心脏起搏器
心动过缓
心房阈值管理
心房频率重整
房室传导
Pacemaker
Bradyarrhythmias
Atrial capture management
Atrial chamber reset
Atrio-ventricular conduction