期刊文献+

人工髋关节置换术后5年内翻修的原因分析及处理方法 被引量:8

Clinical analysis of revision after primary hip replacement in the early stage
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨初次髋关节置换术后早期翻修的原因和防治方法.方法 回顾性分析2002年1月至2007年6月55例行人工髋关节翻修术患者的资料,其中术后5年内(含5年)翻修11例,翻修原因及翻修方式为:髋臼假体位置不良导致复发性脱位2例,手术调整髋臼假体位置;髋臼假体松动5例,翻修髋臼和(或)股骨假体;术后早期股骨假体周围骨折2例,行骨折复位固定;股骨头磨损髋臼1例,行全髋翻修;感染1例,行二期手术翻修.术前和术后随访采用Harris评分评估髋关节功能.术前Harris评分平均46分(28~62分).结果 本组随访时间16~76个月,平均36个月.术后Harris评分提高至平均86分(75~96分).术后出现并发症2例:1例术后局部血肿形成,4周后需再次手术清理血肿;1例术后关节不稳,经适当牵引制动后关节不稳定现象消失.无感染、深静脉血栓、主要血管和神经损伤等并发症发生.结论 初次髋关节置换早期翻修主要原因与髋臼假体处理、假体选择和安放技术不当有关,因此提高髋臼假体安放的手术技术有助于改善人工髋关节的疗效. Objectives To analyze the reason of revisions no more than S years after primary hip replacement,and to discuss the methods how to prevent and manage. Methods Retrospectively review 11 cases with revision no more than 5 years after primary total hip replacement from January 2002 to June 2007. The reasons for revision were as follows: 2 cases were recurrent dislocation due to malposition of acetabular prosthesis; 5 cases were loosening of acetabular prosthesis; 1 case was abrasion of the native acetabulum by bipolar femoral head; 2 cases were periprosthetic femoral fractures and 1 case was periprosthetic infection. The average follow-up time was 36 months. Each patient was assessed according to Harris hip score. The revision procedures including liner only, acetabular prosthesis only, or both acetabular prosthesis and femoral prosthesis depending on the reasons for revision, two-stage revision was performed on 1 case with periprosthetic infection. Results The average of Harris hip score was increased from 46 (28 to 62 ) preoperatively to 86(75 to 96) at follow up. The complication occurred in 2 cases; one was postoperative haematoma formation who was performed further surgery for clearance of haematoma, another was slight instability of the hip joint who was accepted skin traction for 3 weeks. Conclusions The main reason for revision after primary total hip replacement is related to uncorrected insert of acetabular prosthesis. Improving surgical technique of insert of acetabular prosthesis is important in primary total hip replacement.
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第14期1069-1073,共5页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
基金 广东省科技计划项目资助(2008B030301042)
关键词 关节成形术 置换 治疗失败 髋关节翻修 Arthroplasty, replacement, hip Treatment failure Revision hip arthroplasty
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Clauss M,Luem M,Ochsner PE,et al.Fixation and loosening of the cemented Midler straight stem:a long-term clinical and radiological review.J Bone Joint Surg Br,2009,91:1158-1163.
  • 2Belmont PJ Jr,Powers CC,Beykirch SE,et al.Results of the anatomic medullary locking total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of twenty years.A concise follow-up of previous reports.J Bone Joint Surg Am,2008,90:1524-1530.
  • 3Parvizi J,Picinic E,Sharkey PF,et al.Revision total hip arthroplasty for instability:surgical techniques and principles.J Bone Joint Surg Am,2008,90:1134-1142.
  • 4Parvizi J,Kim KI,Goldberg G,et al.Recuttent instability after total hip arthroplasty:beware of subtle component malpositioning.Clin orthop Relat Res,2006(447):60-65.
  • 5Ferrell MS,Browne JA,Attarian DE.et al.Cementless porous-coated anatomic total hip arthroplasty at Duke:18-to 24-year follow-up.J Surg Orthop Adv,2009,18:150-154.
  • 6Springer BD,Berry DJ,Lewallen DG.Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty with femoral component revision.J Bone Joint Surg Am,2003,85:2156-2162.
  • 7Bauer TW,Parvizi J,Kobayashi N,et al.Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection.J Bone Joint Surg Am,2006,88:869-882.
  • 8Phillips JE,Crane TP,Noy M,et al.The incidence of deep prothetic infection in a specialist orthopaedic hospital:a 15-year prospective survey.J Bone Joint Surg Br,2006,88:943-948.
  • 9Hofmann AA,Goldberg TD,Tanner AM,et al.Ten-year experience using an artigulating antibiotic cement hip spacer for the treatment of chronically infected total hip.J Arthroplasty,2005,20:874-879.
  • 10Wentworth SJ.Masri BA,Duncan CP,et al.Hip prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement for treatment of infections following total hip arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Am,2002,84:123-128.

同被引文献69

  • 1章建华,季卫锋,童培建,厉驹,肖鲁伟.股骨粗隆间骨折DHS内固定失败相关因素分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2005,13(8):577-579. 被引量:199
  • 2郑得志,于建华,杨有庚,周连星,李卫哲,林枫松.股骨转子间骨折动力髋螺钉内固定失败的危险因素[J].中华创伤杂志,2006,22(2):129-132. 被引量:109
  • 3Glassner PJ, Tejwani NC. Failure of proximal femoral locking compression plate: a case series [ J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2011, 25(2) :76 -83.
  • 4Jensen JS, Tcnde-old E, Sonne - Holm S. Stable trochanteric fractures. A comparati-e analysis of four methods of internal fixa- tion [ J ]. Acta Orthop Scand, 1980, 51 (5) : 811 - 816.
  • 5Kim WY, Han CH, Park JI, et al. Failure of intertrochanteric fracture fixation with a dynamic hip screw in relation to pre - oper- ati-e fracture stability and osteoporosis [ J]. Inter Orthop, 2001,25(6) :360 -362.
  • 6Abhay P, Chris B, Vladimir S. Treatment of stable extra - capsu- lar hip fractures with a sliding screw -ersus short gamma nail : a ret- rospecti-e study of 102 patients [ J ]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2007, 17(1) :51 -56.
  • 7Baker RP, Squires B, Gargan MF, et al. Total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty in mobile, independent patients with a dis- placed intracapsular fratrure of the femoral neck : a randomized,controlled trim [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006, 88 ( 12 ) : 2583 - 2589.
  • 8Gebhard JS, Amstutz HC, Zinar DM, et al. A comparison of to- tal hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty for treatment of acute fracture of the femoral neck[ J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1992, (282) :123 - 131.
  • 9Sewell MD, Hanna SA, Muirhead- Allwood SK, et ah Custom cementless THA in patients with skeletal dysplasia results in low- er apparent re-ision rates than other types of femoral fixation[ J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011,469 (5) :1406 -1412.
  • 10Clohisy JC, Cal-ert G, Tull F, et ah Reasons for re-ision hip surgery: a retrospecti-e re-iew [ J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004, (429) :188 - 192.

引证文献8

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部