期刊文献+

髋臼加强杯在髋臼翻修术中的应用 被引量:1

Acetabular revision arthroplasty using antiprotrusio cage
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 观察髋臼加强杯在髋臼翻修手术中巨大髋臼骨缺损修复中的应用疗效.方法 2003年2月至2008年10月对12例在翻修术中存在严重髋臼骨缺损的患者采用植骨与髋臼加强杯重建髋臼骨缺损后固定假体.手术前、后情况进行临床评估及影像学评估.术前骨缺损分类按Paprosky分型:ⅡB型2例,ⅢA型6例,ⅢB型4例.术前Harris评分平均为35.2分.结果 术后所有患者均获随访,平均随访时间37个月(9~71个月);术后第一次随访时Harris评分平均为80.9分,末次随访时平均84.6分.术后假体无松动或断裂.有1例患者翻修术后6个月于髋臼Delee&Chamley Ⅲ区出现轻度放射线透亮带,但继续随访未进展.未出现假体失败而需要再次翻修病例.结论 采用髋臼加强杯联合植骨技术可有效修复髋臼骨缺损,重建髋臼结构稳定性,中短期随访疗效可靠. Objective To study the efficacy of acetabular antiprotrusio cage for the reconstruction of acetabular bone defect in revision hip arthroplasty. Methods Twelve cases of severe acetabular bone defect after total hip arthroplasty were revised with antiprotrusio cage and bone grafting from February 2003 to October 2008. Clinical and radiological data before and after revision surgery were collected and compared for assessment Results The classification of acetabular bone defect of this group of patients according to Paprosky classification was; 2 cases of type Ⅱ B, 6 cases of type Ⅲ A and 4 cases of type Ⅲ B. The average postoperative follow-up period was 37 months (9-71 months). Mean Harris score of all cases was 35. 2 before revision surgery, 80.9 at the first time follow-up and 84.6 at latest follow-up. There were no prosthesis loosening and breakage. There was mild radiolucent line in Delee & Charnley Ⅲ zone of the acetabulum in one patient 6 month after revision, but no deterioration was found during further follow-up. No further revision was needed in this group of patients during the follow-up. Conclusions Reconstruction of acetabular bone defect using antiprotrusio cage and bone grafting is a useful method to restore the bone defect and stability of the acetabulum. The outcome via short to middle term follow-up is encouraging.
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第14期1074-1078,共5页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
关键词 关节成形术 置换 治疗失败 髋臼骨缺损 加强杯 Arthroplasty, replacement, hip Treatment failure Acetabular bone defect Antiprotrusio cage
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Paprosky WG,Sporer SS,Murphy BP.Addressing severe bone deficiency:what a cage will not do.J Arthroplasty,2007,22(4 Suppl l):lll-115.
  • 2Paprosky WG,Perona PG,Lawrence JM.Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty.A 6-year follow-up evaluation.J Arthroplasty,1994,9:33-44.
  • 3Harris WH.Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures; Treatment by mold arthroplasty.An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation.J Bone Joint Surg Am,1969,51:737-755.
  • 4Gill TJ,Sledge JB,Mtlller ME.The management of severe bone loss using structural allograft and acetabular reinforcement devices.J Arthroplasty,2000,15:1-7.
  • 5DeLee JG,Charnley J.Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement.Clin Orthop Relat Res,1976 (121):20-32.
  • 6Garbuz D,Morsi E,Gross AE.Revision of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty with a massive structural allograft:study with a minimum five-year follow-up.J Bone Joint Surg Am,1996,78:693-697.
  • 7Goldberg VM.Selection of bone grafts for revision total hip arthroplasty.Clin Orthop Relat Res,2000(381):68-76.
  • 8周勇刚,张强,王岩.打压植骨结合金属网重建髋臼严重骨缺损[J].中华外科杂志,2009,47(3):172-176. 被引量:11
  • 9刘志宏,冯建民,杨庆铭.全髋关节翻修术中髋臼严重缺损的钢板重建[J].中华骨科杂志,2001,21(12):734-737. 被引量:13
  • 10Schlegel UJ,Bitsch RG,Pritsch M,et al.Mueller reinforcement rings in acetabular revision; outcome in 164 hips followed for 2-17 years.Acta Orthop,2006,77:234-241.

二级参考文献13

  • 1王岩,周勇刚.嵌压植骨技术在人工全髋关节翻修术中的应用[J].中华外科杂志,2005,43(20):1309-1312. 被引量:21
  • 2赵建宁,郭亭,周利武,曾晓峰,陆维举,施鑫,吴苏稼.颗粒骨打压植骨技术在治疗髋臼骨缺损中的应用[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2006,21(5):341-343. 被引量:10
  • 3周勇刚,王岩.应用解剖型骨水泥股骨假体结合冻干骨打压植骨进行髋关节翻修[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(7):507-509. 被引量:15
  • 4Mendes DG, Roffman M, Silbermann M. Reconstruction of the acetabular wall with bone graft in arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1984 (186) :29-38.
  • 5Slooff TJ, van Horn J, Lemmens A, et al. Bone grafting for total hip replacement in acetabular protrusion. Acta Orthop Scand, 1984,55:593-597.
  • 6Schreurs BW, Slooff TJ, Buma P, et al. Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morsellised cancellous bone graft and cement: a 10- to-15-year follow-up of 60 revision arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1998, 80:391-395.
  • 7Wehen ML, Schreurs BW, Buma P, et al. Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morcellized cancellous bone autograft and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty: a 10-to 17-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty, 2000, 15 : 819-824.
  • 8Coathup M, Smith N, Kingsley C, et al. Impaetion grafting with a bone-graft substitute in a sheep model of revision hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2008, 90:246-253.
  • 9van der Donk S, Buma P, Slooff TJ, et al. Incorporation of morselized bone grafts: a study of 24 acetabular biopsy specimens. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2002(396) :131-141.
  • 10van Haaren EH, Heyligers IC, Alexander FGM, et al. High rate of failure of impaction grafting in large acetabular defects. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2007, 89:296-300.

共引文献22

同被引文献14

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部