期刊文献+

稻瘟菌侵染对水稻细胞骨架排列方式的影响 被引量:1

Effects of Magnaporthe grisea Penetration on Cytoskeleton Reorganization of Rice Cells
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用免疫荧光技术成功检测到水稻叶鞘内表皮细胞中微管和微丝的分布情况.稻瘟病菌的侵染使水稻叶鞘内表皮细胞中微管、微丝排列方式发生明显的改变,这种排列方式的改变非常灵敏,且在亲和性互作和非亲和性互作之间差异明显.非亲和性互作反应中,病菌侵染早期微管、微丝均放射状向病菌侵染点分布,至寄主细胞产生过敏性坏死时,逐渐受到破坏而降解.亲和性互作反应中,微管、微丝在病菌侵染的早期则已开始降解,形成短棒状或点状结构,比较均匀地分布于整个细胞,病原菌侵染菌丝在寄主细胞中扩展时,难以观察到完整的微管、微丝. M. grisea penetration resulted in rapid and striking reorganization of microtubules and mierofilaments in cells of rice leaf sheath. The distribution patterns of cytoskeleton in the incompatible interaction of rice and M. grisea were different from those in compatible interaction. In cells undergoing resistant response, microtubules and microfilaments of rice cells radiated to fungal penetration site during the process of fungal penetration. Then they were gradually fragmented and eliminated from host cells after hypersensitive cell death occurred. However, in cells undergoing susceptible response, the cytoskeleton was severely damaged and fragmented quickly at the initial stage of fungal penetration. As the disease development, fine bundles of cytoskeleton were seldom observed in host cells although the cytoskeleton of M. grisea was normally detected.
出处 《福建师范大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第4期95-100,共6页 Journal of Fujian Normal University:Natural Science Edition
基金 福建省自然科学基金重点资助项目(2006J0006)
关键词 水稻 稻瘟菌 微管 微丝 抗病性 rice Magnaporthe grisea microtubules microfilaments resistance
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Takeraoto D,Hardham A R.Update:The cytoskeleton as a regulator and target of biotic interactions in plants[J].Plant Physiolgy,2004,136:3864-3876.
  • 2Kobayashi I,Kobayashi Y,Hardham A R.Dynamic reorganization of microtubules and microfilaments in flax ceils during the resistance response to flax rust infection[J].Planta,1994,195:237-247.
  • 3Hardham A R,Takemoto D,White R G.Rapid and dynamic subcellular reorganization folloming mechanical stimulation of Arabidopsis epidermal cells mimics responses to fungal and oomycete attack[J].BMC Plant Biology,2008,8:63-77.
  • 4杨民和,郑重,Jan E.LEACH.微管、微丝特异性抑制剂处理对水稻抗病性的影响[J].植物病理学报,2003,33(2):156-161. 被引量:6
  • 5Baluska F,Bacigalova K,Oud J L.Rapid reorganization of microtubular cytoskeleton accompanies early changes in nuclear ploidy and chromatin structure in postmitotic cells of barley leaves infected with powdery mildew[J].Protoplasma,2005,185:140-151.
  • 6Kobayashi Y,Kobayashi I,Funaki Y.Dynamic reorganization of microfilaments and microtubules is necessary for the expression of non-host resistance in barley coleoptile cells[J].The Plant Journal,1997,11(3):527-537.
  • 7Sonobe S,Shibaoka H.Cortical fine actin filments in higher plant cells visualized by rhodamine-phalloidin after pretreatment with m-maleimidobenzoyl N-hydroxysuccinimide ester[J].Protoplasma,1989,148:80-86.
  • 8Kobayashi Y,Yamada M,Kobayashi I,et al.Actin microfilaments are required for the expression of nonhost resistance in higher plants[J].Plant Cell Physiology,1997,38(6):725-733.
  • 9McLusky S R,Bennett M,Beale M.Cell wall alterations and localized accumulation of feruoly-3'-methoxytyramine in onion epidermis at sites of attempted penetration by Botrytis allii are associated with actin polarization,peroxidase activity and suppression of flavonoid biosynthesis[J].The Plant Journal,1999,17(5):523-534.
  • 10Hardham A R,Takemoto D,Jones D A.Cytoskeleton and cell wall function in penetration resistance[J].Current Opinion in Plant Biology,2007,10:342-348.

二级参考文献20

  • 1Hammnond-Kesack K E, Jones J D G. Resistance gene-dependent plant response[J].The Plant Cell,1996,8:1773 - 1791.
  • 2Kobayashi I, Kobayashi Y, Yamada M, et al. The involvement of cytoskeleton in the expression of nonhost resistance in plants[ A]. Mills D,Kunoh H, Keen N T. Molecular Aspects of Pathogenicity and Resistance Requirement for Signal transduction[C]. St. Paul: APS Press,1996. 185 - Lq5.
  • 3Volkmann D, Baluska F. Actin cytoskeleton in plants: from transport network to signaling network[J]. Microscopy Research and Technique,1999,47:135 - 154.
  • 4Laznrowitz S G, Beachy R N. Viral movement proteins as probes for intercellular and intercellular trafficking in plants [ J ]. The Plant Cell,1999,11:535 -548.
  • 5Furuse K, Takernoto D, Dolce N, et al. Involvement of actin filament association in hypersensitive reactions in potato cells[ J]. Physiol. Mol.Plant Pathology, 1999,54:51-61.
  • 6LaFountain J R, Siegel A J, Rickards G K. Chromosome movement during meiotic prophase in crane-fly spermatocytes: IV. Actin and the effects of cytoehalasin D[J]. cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton, 1999,43:199 - 212.
  • 7Kobayashi Y, Knbayashi I, Funaki Y, et al. Dynamic reorganization of microfilaments and microtubules is necessary for the expression of non-host resistance in barley coleoptile cells[J]. The Plant Cell, 1997, 11(3):527 -537.
  • 8Politis D J, Goodman R N. Localized cell wall appositions: incompatibility response of tobacco leaf cells to Pseudomonas pisi[ J ]. Phytopathology, 1978, 68:309-316.
  • 9Synder B A, Leite B, Hipskind J, et al. Accumulation of sorghum phytoalexins induced by Colletotrichum graminicola at the infection sites[J]. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 1991, 39:463-470.
  • 10McLusky S R, Bennett M, Beale M, et al.Cell wall alterations and localized accumulation of feroly-3'-methoxytyramine in onion epidermis at sites of attempted penetration by Botrytis allii are associated with actin polarization, peroxidase activity and suppression of flavonoid biosynthesis[J]. The Plant Journal, 1999, 17(5) :523 - 534.

共引文献9

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部