期刊文献+

我国上市公司风险倾向的实证研究 被引量:5

Empirical Research on Risk Propensity of China's Listed Companies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文应用前景理论(Prospect Theory)对我国上市公司的风险倾向进行了研究,结果发现:(1)业绩低于目标水平的企业,风险-回报呈显著的负相关关系;(2)业绩高于目标水平的企业,风险-回报没有相关关系。这一发现说明,(1)我国上市公司中的问题企业同样更倾向冒险;(2)我国上市公司的风险倾向不完全符合前景理论的预期;(3)我国企业较欧美企业具有更强的冒险倾向。本文从多个方面对造成这一现象的原因进行了解释,并对进一步的研究给出了建议。 The Paper studied the risk propensity of China's listed companies by using of prospect theory.We found that(1)for returns below target,a large majority of firms appeared to be risk seeking;(2)for returns above target,a large majority of firms appeared to be risk neutrality.These finding suggest that(1)troubled firms also seek more risk in China;(2)firms'risk propensity of China is not completely consistent with prediction of prospect theory;(3)China's firms has a stronger risk-taking propensity than firms in developed countries.We discussed the issue from multi-perspectives and offered several suggestions on further study.
作者 曾进
机构地区 昆明理工大学
出处 《预测》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第4期47-52,80,共7页 Forecasting
关键词 风险倾向 Bowman悖论 前景理论 制度 risk propensity Bowman paradox prospect theory institution
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Bowman E H.A risk/return paradox for strategic management[J].Sloan Management Review,1980,21(3):17-31.
  • 2Bowman E H.Risk seeking by troubled firms[J].Sloan Management Review,1982,23(4):33-42.
  • 3Fiegenbaum A,Thomas H.Attitudes toward risk and the risk-return paradox:prospect theory explanations[J].Academy of Management Journal,1988,31(1):85-106.
  • 4Jegers M.Prospect theory and the risk-return relation:some belgian evidence[J].Academy of Management Journal,1991,34(1):215-225.
  • 5Sinha T.Prospect theory and the risk return association:another look[J].Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,1994,24(6):225-231.
  • 6Kahneman D,Tversky A.Prospect theory:an analysis of decision under risk[J].Econometrica,1979,47(2):263-292.
  • 7Bromiley P.Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance[J].Academy of Management Journal,1991,34(1):37-59.
  • 8Miller K D,Leibein M.Corporate risk-return relations:returns variability versus downside risk[J].Academy of Management Journal,1996,39(1):91-122.
  • 9Singh J.Performance,slack,and risk taking in organizational decision making[J].Academy of Management Journal,1986,29(3):562-585.
  • 10Cyert R M,March J G.A behavioral theory of the firm[M].Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs,1963.

二级参考文献45

共引文献28

同被引文献109

  • 1李洁,谢晓非.风险倾向的跨文化差异研究综述[J].社会心理科学,2007(Z2):28-33. 被引量:3
  • 2余明江,谭小梅.行为财务理论:综述与启示[J].新疆财经,2004(4):35-37. 被引量:5
  • 3吴红梅.西方组织伦理氛围研究探析[J].外国经济与管理,2005,27(9):32-38. 被引量:31
  • 4Adams R, Almeida H, Ferreira D. Understanding the Relationships Between Founder-CEOs and Firm Performance [ J ]. Journal of Empirical Finance ,2009, ( 1 ) : 136 - 150.
  • 5Avi F, Howard T. Attitudes Toward Risk and Risk-Return Paradox: Prospect Theory Explanations [ J ]. The Academy of Man- agement Journal, 1988, ( 1 ) :85 - 106.
  • 6Belghitar Y, Clark E A. The Effect of CEO Risk Appetite on Firm Volatility : An Empirical Analysis of Financial Firms [ J ]. In- ternational Journal of the Economics of Business,2012, (2) : 195 - 211.
  • 7Bowman E H. Risk Seeking by Troubled Firms[ J]. Sloan Management Review, 1982, (4) :33 -42.
  • 8Brookman J, Thistle P D. CEO Tenure, the Risk of Termination and Firm Value [ J ]. Journal of Corporate Finance,2009, (3) : 331 - 344.
  • 9Chao M C H, Kumar V. The Impact of Institutional Distance on the International Diversity-Performance Relationships [ J ]. Journal of World Business ,2010, ( 1 ) :93 - 103.
  • 10Chen H L, Hsu W T, Huang Y S. Top Management Team Characteristics, R&D Investment and Capital Structure in the IT In- dustry[ J]. Small Business Economics,2010, (3):319- 333.

引证文献5

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部