期刊文献+

从连坐观念分析酒后驾驶行政处罚扩大化的正当性——兼评“与醉驾司机同乘一车的乘客也应进行处罚” 被引量:1

The Analysis on Legitimacy of the Magnify of the Administrative Punishment for Driving After Drinking from the Concept of "LianZuo"——on the Idea that "Passengers Who are in the Same Car Driven by the Drunk Driver Should Also Be Punished"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对日趋严重的酒后驾驶引发的交通安全问题,各国积极探寻应对措施,如酒后驾驶的犯罪化、加大行政处罚力度等;我国交通管理部门也提出了"与醉驾司机同乘一车的乘客也应进行处罚"的建议稿。对此,我们从连坐处罚的观念出发探讨其正当性的缘由,认为应当从参与者与保证人视角出发,结合同乘一车的乘客的具体情况作具体分析,才能得出较为合理的结论。 Against the increasingly serious traffic safety problems caused by drunk driving,all countries in the world are actively seeking for the reacting measures,such as the criminalization of drunk driving and the increase of administrative punishment. The most controversial issue is the "lianzuo",that is,the punishment for being related to the one charged. In China,traffic management department also put forward the draft of proposal that passengers who are in the same car driven by the drunk driver should also be punished. The authors explore the legitimacy from the concept of "lianzuo",maintaining that considering specific circumstances of the passengers,more reasonable conclusions can be reached from the perspective of participants and guarantors.
作者 沈玉忠
出处 《江苏社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第4期145-151,共7页 Jiangsu Social Sciences
关键词 酒后驾车 连坐观念 行政处罚 同车乘客 责任原则 drunk driving the concept of "lianzuo" administrative punishment passenger in the same car the principle of liability
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1汤儒彦 曹寿民.《从连坐处罚观念探讨酒醉驾车行政处罚的界限》[J].台北大学法学论丛,2006,(62).
  • 2洪家殷.《行政秩序论》,[台北]五南书局2000年版,第3-4页.
  • 3黄荣坚.《刑罚的极限》,[台北]元照出版公司1999年版,第24-30页.
  • 4《南京劝司机饮酒者将“连坐”》,[北京]《京华时报》,2009年8月17日,第21版.

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部