期刊文献+

狗尾草对加筋土坯力学性能的影响 被引量:41

Impact of Green Bristle Grass on Mechanical Properties of Reinforced Adobe
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究狗尾草作为加筋材料对制作的土坯抗压强度、抗剪强度和抗折强度等力学性能的影响.方法将不同长度,不同掺量的狗尾草作为加筋材料加入到生土中,制作成相应的土坯,通过测试其抗压、抗剪和抗折强度,研究加筋材料的长度和掺量对土坯力学性能的影响.结果狗尾草的长度和掺量对土坯抗压强度影响不显著;对狗尾草长度为3~5cm和5~7cm的土坯,当狗尾草加筋率在0.5%时,土坯试件抗剪强度达到最大值,分别为42.9kPa和49.1kPa,狗尾草长度为7~10cm的土坯,加筋率在0.5%时,试件抗剪强度达到最大为58.9kPa;3个加筋长度段的土坯试件抗折强度均随加筋量的增加而增大,当加筋率达到0.7%时,抗折强度达到最大值,分别为56.3kPa,57.8kPa和58.9kPa.结论加筋草的长度和质量对土坯抗压强度影响不显著,但可以较大程度的提高土坯的抗剪和抗折强度,改善土坯的力学性能. This study presents the impact of green bristle grass as reinforced material on the mechanical properties of adobe, such as compressive, sheering and flexural strength. Through testing the mechanical properties of adobe ,the impact of reinforced material's length and amount on the properties is studied. The length and amount of the grass have no clear influence on the mechanical properties of adobe. In terms of the grass with the length 3 - 5 cm and 5 - 7 cm, when the amount portion is 0. 5 %, the sheering strength of adobes achieve maximum with 42.9 kPa and 49. 1 kPa respectively. In view of the grass with the length 7 - 10 cm, when grass mass portion is 0.5% ,their sheering strength be comes best with 58.9 kPa. As the amount portion of grass rises to 0. 7% ,the flexural strength of adobes increases to 56. 3 kPa,57.8 kP and 58.9 kPa. The conclusion is that the strength and quality of grass have few impacts on the compressive strength of adobe, but it can enhance sheering and flexural strength of adobe and improve the mechanical properties of adobe.
出处 《沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2010年第4期720-723,733,共5页 Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University:Natural Science
基金 国家十一五重大科技支撑计划项目(2006BAJ04A04) 辽宁省教育厅创新团队项目(2007T148) 辽宁省百千万人才资助项目(2008921034) 沈阳市人才资源开发专项基金资助项目(2008140403011)
关键词 力学性能 狗尾草 生土 加筋 mechanical properties green bristle grass soil reinforced material
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1何光春.加筋土工程设计与施工[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2005.
  • 2Haeri S M,Noorzad R.Oakoorouehi A M.Effect of geotextile reinforeement on the mechanieal behavior of sand[J].Geotextile and Geomembranes,2005(18):385-402.
  • 3Achenza M,Fenu L.On earth stabilization with natural polymers for earth masonry construction[J].Materials and Structures,2006,39(1):21-27.
  • 4Morel J C,Pkla A,Walker P.Compressive strength testing of compressed earth blocks[J].Construct Build Mater,2007,21:303-309.
  • 5黄金胜,陶忠,陆琨,潘文.云南农村居民生土建筑土坯砌体的力学性能试验研究[J].工程抗震与加固改造,2008,30(1):94-98. 被引量:33
  • 6Jayasinghe C,Kamaladasa N.Compressive strength characteristics of cement stabilized rammed earth walls[J].Construction and Building Materials,2007,21:1971-1976.
  • 7王毅红,王春英,李先顺,石坚,李敏.生土结构的土料受压及受剪性能试验研究[J].西安科技大学学报,2006,26(4):469-472. 被引量:49
  • 8Nurhayat Degirmenci.The using of waste phosphogypsum and natural gypsum in adobe stabilization[J].Construction and Building Materials,2008,22:1220-1224.
  • 9Matthew H,Youcef D.Rammed earth sample production:context,recommendations and consistency[J].Construction and Building Materials,2003(18):281-286.
  • 10陈昌富,刘怀星,李亚平.草根加筋土的室内三轴试验研究[J].岩土力学,2007,28(10):2041-2045. 被引量:108

二级参考文献29

共引文献177

同被引文献271

引证文献41

二级引证文献217

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部