期刊文献+

公共部门定点扶贫的利益冲突与平衡 被引量:3

Game Relationship in Fixed-point Poverty Alleviation by Public Sectors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 公共部门定点扶贫,是指由党政机关等公共部门有计划地筹集资金以及派遣专职人员进驻重点贫困村,并通过各种渠道促使该村脱贫致富的一种扶贫模式。目前,在公共部门定点扶贫实践过程中,存在着公共部门、贫困农户和地方组织三个利益方之间的利益冲突,这些冲突极大地影响到定点扶贫的绩效。应通过建立博弈主体之间的有效沟通机制、建立有效约束博弈主体的制度规范和构建博弈主体持续合作的信任关系等方式来平衡各利益主体之间的冲突,以提升公共部门定点扶贫的绩效。 The fixed-point poverty alleviation by public sectors is the poverty alleviation mode that the public sectors of the Party organs and Governmental departments are planned to raise money and to dispatch specific persons to live in poor villages and to use all kinds of methods to make the villages become rich. Currently, in the processes of public sector' s poverty alleviation, there are interest conflicts between three parties such as public sector, rural poor households and local organization, and the conflicts seriously affect the performance of fixed-point poverty alleviation. The conflicts between each subject of interests can be mitigated by establishing effective communication mechanism between game subjects and by setting up institutions and regulations to restrict game subjects and by constructing sustainable cooperation trust relationship between game subjects and so on in order to raise the performance of fixed-point poverty alleviation of public sectors.
作者 许源源 徐俊
出处 《西部论坛》 2010年第4期12-16,23,共6页 West Forum
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(07CZZ002)"中国农村扶贫瞄准问题研究" 湖南省软科学重点项目(2007ZK2011)"湖南省农村扶贫资金投入模式研究"
关键词 定点扶贫 公共部门 贫困农户 地方组织 博弈主体 集体行动 利益冲突 fixed-point poverty alleviation public sector poor family local organization game subject collective action conflict of interests
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献24

  • 1[2]以下模型均来自:Lisa Martin.Interests,Power and Multilateralism.International Organization,Vol.46,Autumn 1992,p.769-781.
  • 2[3]Lisa Martin.Interests,Power and Multilateralism.International Organization,p766.
  • 3[6]http://www. cctv. com/special/326/3/29026. html
  • 4[7]http://www. cctv. com/special/326/0/29647. html
  • 5[8]Peter Bennett. Modeling Decisions in International Relations: Game Theory and beyond, International Studies Quarterly, Apr95 Suplement 1, Vol. 39,p23.
  • 6[9]Steven J. Brams. Game Theory: Pitfalls and Opportunities in Applying It to International Relations, International Studies Perspectives, (2000,1), p222.
  • 7[11]Peter Bennett. Modeling Decisions in International Relations: Game Theory and beyond. International Studies Quarterly, p28.
  • 8[12]Steven J. Brams. Game Theory: Pitfalls and Opportunities in Applying It to International Relations. International Studies Perspectives, p222.
  • 9[14]John J. Mearsheimer. The False Promise of International Institutions, in Michael E. Brown etc ed, Theories of War and Peace. Cambridge, Massachusetts, the MIT Press, 2000, p350.
  • 10[15]Robert Keohane, The Promise of Institutionalist Theory, in Michael E. Brown etc ed, Theories of War and Peace.Cambridge, Massachusetts, the MIT Press, 2000, p389.

共引文献31

同被引文献15

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部