期刊文献+

宫颈疾病Leep刀环形切除术临床分析 被引量:1

Analysis of Leep Knife-Loop Excision Cervical Disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨Leep刀切除术治疗宫颈疾病的可行性和安全性。方法对126例经妇科检查、阴道镜检查、宫颈液基细胞检查及活检诊断为各种宫颈疾病的患者均采用Leep刀环形切除术,手术后标本送病理检查,同时观察患者术中反应、术中出血量、手术时间、术后修复,随访6个月。结果 Leep刀环形切除术平均出血量3~10 mL,平均手术时间2~6 min,无继发出血及感染,无宫颈管狭窄和粘连,月经正常,治疗宫颈疾病总有效率84.13%,宫颈修复好,标本经病理学检查确诊。结论 Leep刀环形切除术治疗宫颈疾病便易、安全、可不住院、经济,也适用于基层医院,治愈率高,可提供病理学诊断,值得临床广泛推广应用。 Objective To investigate the Leep knife excision of cervical disease, the feasibility and safety. Methods One hundred and twenty six patients were provided by gynecological exami- nation,colposcopy,cervical liquid-based cytology, and biopsy, and was diagnosed of a variety of cervical outpatient or inpatient disease. They were operated on by using Leep knife ring resection. Specimens were sent to pathological examination after surgery, while observing the reaction of patients with surgery, blood loss, operative time, postoperative rehabilitation, and had 6-month fol- low-up. Results The average blood volume of Leep knife-loop excision was 3 - 10 mL and the average operation time was 2 - 6 min. There was no secondary bleeding and infection,no cervical canal stenosis and adhesions, and normal menstruation. The effective rate was 84. 13%, cervical repair is good,specimens could be diagnosed by pathological examination. Conclusion Leep knife circular resection of cervical disease would be easy, safe, may from time to hospitalization, econo- my,and also apply to the grass-roots hospitals. It is a high cure rate,providing pathological diagnosis, worthy to be widely used.
出处 《实用临床医学(江西)》 CAS 2010年第7期62-63,82,共3页 Practical Clinical Medicine
关键词 LEEP刀 宫颈疾病 宫颈环切术 Leep knife cervical disease cervical excision
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献16

  • 1杨斌,王爱民,黎雯.宫颈病变与人类乳头瘤病毒的研究进展[J].国外医学(皮肤性病学分册),2005,31(3):151-153. 被引量:12
  • 2曾华彬.高频电波刀在宫颈病变的应用[J].福建医科大学学报,2005,39(4):476-478. 被引量:6
  • 3邬素芳,易诚青,徐茜,王薇,辜海念,卢运萍,马丁.杂交捕获二代法检测高危型人乳头瘤病毒DNA的意义[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2006,22(3):181-183. 被引量:15
  • 4谭毅,李淑玲,谢平,林婷.高危型人乳头瘤病毒联合细胞学检测原发和复发重度宫颈上皮内瘤变[J].实用医学杂志,2006,22(6):672-673. 被引量:13
  • 5Fung KFM, Senterman M, Faught W. Should endocervieal excision and curettage be done during LEEP? Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 1997,18(2) :104.
  • 6Hillemanns P, Kimmig R, Danneeker C, et al. LEEP versus cold knife conization for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias.Zentralbl Gynakol,2000,122( 1 ) :35.
  • 7Boulanger JC, Gondry J, Verhoest P, et al. Treatment of CIN after menopause. Bur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2001,95 (2) : 175.
  • 8John Y,John A,Julius,et al. Cervical cone margins as a predictor for residual dysplasia in postcone hysterectomy specimens. Obstet Gyneco1,1994,84( 1 ) :128.
  • 9Lapaquette TK, Dinh TV, Hannigan E, et al. Management of patients with positive margins after cervical conization. Obstet Gynecol,1993,82(3) :440.
  • 10Ferenczy A, Choukroun D, Falcon T, et al. The effect of cervical loop electrosurgical excision on subsequent pregnancy outcome : North American experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1995,172 (4) : 1246.

共引文献373

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部