期刊文献+

再议曹操高陵葬制——以对曹丕黄初三年诏的分析为中心

Another Discussion of Funeral Norms of Cao Cao's Gaoling Mausoleum:Centering on Analyzing Cao Pi's Imperial Edict Issued on the Third Year of Huangchu
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对于曹操葬制存在诸多争议。曹丕黄初三年(222年)诏所透露的有关曹操高陵葬制的信息,也为相关讨论提供了重要的历史资料。现在看来,高陵"陵上祭殿"确实存在。被称为曹丕"终制"的诏令被赋予传世之戒条的意义,当时已在相当广泛的范围内公布,实际上已经成为一个半公开的文件。不论魏文帝曹丕的本意如何,这一诏令所取得的宣传效应是明显的。我们以为这篇措辞严厉的文字值得注意的,还在于曹丕对于违诏"妄有所变改造施"的诅咒,体现曹操宣告薄葬的遗制,应当得以遵行。我们通过魏文帝曹丕"终制"的文字可以推知,如果他确实对于曹操"薄葬"遗令"有所变改造施",一定不会痛斥反薄葬行为是"愚俗所为",也不会自认"弃君于恶"、"爱以害亲"、"不忠不孝"之名,当然更不会使用"为戮尸地下,戮而又戮,死而重死"一类激烈言辞。很可能文帝黄初三年诏和文帝"终制"原本属于一个文件,也许统称为魏文帝曹丕"黄初三年诏"是适宜的。如果这一假设成立,则马端临注意到的"魏武父子遗令俱欲薄葬"就表现出了连贯性和完整性,其中所透露的有关曹操高陵葬制的信息亦有更值得我们确信的价值。 There are different disputes over Cao Cao's funeral norms. The information about the funeral norms of Cao Cao's Gaoling Mausoleum revealed in Cao Pi' s imperial edict provides important historical materials for relevant discussion. It seems that the record of "building palaces on the mausoleum of Gaoling" is true. Endowed with the significance of being the discipline for the next generations to follow, Cao Pi' s imperial edict on the funeral norms after his death should have been spread in a large scope. In other words, it has actually been a half public document. Whatever Emperor Wei Wendi' s intention was, this edict gained apparent effect of propaganda. Another reason why we should put more focus on this sharply worded edict lies in his curse on those who would not obey his will, which manifests his obedience of Cao Cao' s will of siinple funeral. On the other hand, from his edict, we can infer that if he has changed Cao Cao' s will of simple funeral, he would not criticize those who would like to change his will of funeral. Therefore, it is probable that his edict of the third year of Huangchu and his edict on the funeral norms after his death belong to one document. In this sense, it is proper to name this document the edict of the third year of Huangchu. If this hypothesis is true, the argument of "Cao Cao and his son make a will of simple funeral" proposed by Ma Duanlin is consistent and complete. On the other hand, the information about the funeral norms of Cao Cao's Gaoling Mausoleum revealed in this edict can be more believable.
作者 王子今
出处 《南都学坛(南阳师范学院人文社会科学学报)》 2010年第4期28-31,共4页 Academic Forum of Nandu:Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Nanyang Normal University
关键词 曹操 高陵 曹丕 黄初三年诏 Cao Cao Gaoling Mausoleum Cao Pi imperial edict issued on the third year of Huangchu
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1王子今.曹操“七十二疑冢”辨疑[J].文博,2010(1):11-15. 被引量:3
  • 2李传军,金霞.曹操"七十二疑冢"之传说、史实及意义[N].光明日报,2010-03-02.
  • 3马端临.文献通考[M].北京:中华书局,1986..
  • 4顾炎武.日知录集释[M].长沙:岳麓书社出版社,1994..
  • 5何焯著 崔高维点校.义门读书记[M].北京:中华书局,1987..
  • 6陈寿撰 裴松之注.三国志[M].北京:中华书局,1959..
  • 7王子今.霸陵薄葬辨疑[J].考古与文物,2002(2):72-75. 被引量:6
  • 8《三国志》卷17《魏书·于禁传》(中华书局1959年12月版,第524页.).
  • 9《太平御览》卷373引《魏志》.
  • 10《太平御览》卷491引《魏志》.

二级参考文献7

  • 1.《汉书·文帝纪》[M].,..
  • 2.《史记·孝文本纪》[M].,..
  • 3泷川资言考证,水泽利忠校补.《史记会注考证附校补》第1410页,上海古籍出版社,1986年.
  • 4《史记·孝文本纪》张守节《正义》引《汉晋春秋》.
  • 5王子今.《汉代的女权》[J].东方,1999,.
  • 6黄宛峰.汉文帝并非薄葬[J].南都学坛(南阳师专学报),1995,15(1):10-12. 被引量:5
  • 7王子今.秦始皇陵复土工程用工人数论证[J].文博,1987(1):59-63. 被引量:10

共引文献634

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部