期刊文献+

阴道镜检查在宫颈疾病诊断中的价值 被引量:4

The value of the colposcopy in the diagnosis of cervical disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价阴道镜检查在宫颈疾病诊断中的价值。方法:回顾性分析本院妇产科670例经阴道镜下活检患者的资料,评价阴道镜检查对宫颈病变的诊断价值。结果:阴道镜下病理检查的670例中,检出宫颈上皮内瘤变及宫颈癌110例,占16.4%,其中,CINⅠ65例(59.1%),CINⅡ28例(25.4%),CINⅢ11例(10%),宫颈癌6例(5.5%)。以组织学诊断为标准,阴道镜检查诊断宫颈上皮内瘤变及宫颈癌的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为86.4%、84.3%、51.9%、96.9%。从CINⅠ→CINⅡ→CINⅢ及癌,阴道镜检查的灵敏度分别为84.6%(55/65)、85.7%(24/28)、90.9%(10/11)、100%(6/6)。结论:阴道镜对宫颈上皮内瘤变及宫颈癌的诊断,具有较高的灵敏度和阴性预测值。阴道镜对宫颈高度病变的检出率,高于低度病变的检出率。 Objective:To evaluate colposcopy in the diagnosis of cervical disease.Methods:Retrospective analysis of 670 cases of hospital obstetrics and gynecology by colposcopy and biopsy cases,evaluation of colposcopy for cervical lesions. Results:Colposcopy pathological examination of 670 cases,the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer 110 cases,accounting for 16.4%,which,CIN Ⅰ 65 例 (59.1%),CIN Ⅱ 28 例 (25.4%),CIN Ⅲ 11 cases (10%),6 cases of cervical cancer (5.5%).To histological diagnosis as the standard colposcopy diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value were 86.4% ,84.3% ,51.9% , 96.9%.From CIN Ⅰ→ CIN Ⅱ→ CIN Ⅲ and cancer,the sensitivity of colposcopy was 84.6% (55/65),85.7% (24/28),90.9% (10/11),100%(6/6).Conclusion:Colposcopy of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer diagnosis,with high sensitivity and negative predictive value.Colposcopy of cervical HSIL detection rate,higher than the low detection rate of lesions.
出处 《中国当代医药》 2010年第21期4-5,8,共3页 China Modern Medicine
关键词 宫颈病变 阴道镜 诊断 Cervical lesions Colposcopy Diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献36

  • 1吕卫国,沈源明,叶枫,陈怀增,谢幸.阴道镜直视下活检诊断宫颈上皮内瘤变准确性的评价[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(5):303-306. 被引量:107
  • 2张志胜.主编.阴道镜图谱.第2版.北京:人民卫生出版社.2002.23
  • 3Homesley HD, Jobson VW, Reish RL. Use of colposcopically directed, four-quadrant cervical biopsy by the colposcopy trainee[ J ]. J Reprod Med, 1984,29:311-316
  • 4Starzewski J, Gozdz S, Chil A, et al. Postoperative verification of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade [ J ]. Wiad Lek ,2003,56 : 162-166
  • 5Elit LM. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 [ J]. J Low Genit Tract Dis,2004,8:181-187
  • 6Bonardi R, Cecchini S, Grazzini G, et al. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure of the transformation zone and colposcopically directed punch biopsy in the diagnosis of cervical lesions [ J ]. Obstet Gynecol, 1992,80 : 1020-1022
  • 7Lee KE, Koh CF, Watt WF. Comparison of the grade of CIN in colposcopically directed biopsies with that in outpatient loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) specimens : a retrospective review [ J ]. Singapore Med J, 1999,40 : 694 -696
  • 8Crum CP, McLachlin CM. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J].J Cell Biochem Suppl, 1995,23:71-79
  • 9Miyazaki K, Hiromura K, Minami K, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and time-course change of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[ J ]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho, 2008,35 : 1541- 1545
  • 10Byrom J, Douce G, Jones PW, et al. Should punch biopsies be used when high-grade disease is suspected at initial colposcopic assessment? A prospective study [ J ]. Int J Gynecol Cancer,2006,16:253-256

共引文献19

同被引文献22

引证文献4

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部