法益概念的重新解读——支持“二元论”的一个理由

Reinterpretation of Concept of Legal Interest——Justification of "Dualism"

结果无价值论与行为无价值论(二元论)之间的对立是目前刑法学界最尖锐的学术争论,由此引发的关于违法性的本质究竟是法益侵害还是规范违反的立场之争。"二元论"的主张有其合理性,但理由应当是利益与伦理内涵的同质性。这决定了对法益侵害的考察必须放在伦理规范的框架之中才有意义。这就意味着纯粹的结果无价值显然不能合理地揭示违法的实质。只有坚持"二元论"的主张才能化解这些矛盾。而且,坚持利益与伦理的同质性,有助于深入对实质违法性的研究。

The opposition between consequence without value and conduct without value（dualism） is the sharpest academic controversy and it also leads to the debate concerning whether it is the infringement of the legal interests or the violation of the rules.Dualism is reasonable,but the reason should be the homogeneousness of interest and ethics.So,it＇s appropriate to observe the infringement of the legal interest in the framework of ethics.It means pure consequence without value cannot reveal the nature of illegality reasonably.Only should we insist on the dualism,these contradictions can be neuthalized.What＇s more,sticking to the homogeneousness of interest and ethics will be helpful in studying essential illegality deeply.