期刊文献+

胎心监护、Apgar评分及脐动脉血气分析评估围生儿窒息的临床意义 被引量:11

Clinical Significances of Using Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring,Apgar Score and Umbilical Arterial Blood Gas Analysis to Assess Perinatal Asphyxia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨胎心率、Apgar评分及脐动脉血气分析在围生儿窒息评估中的意义。方法收集本院胎心率<90次.min-1、持续时间>1 min、重复出现5次以上、儿科医师提前到场接生、电子胎心监护(EFM)异常的73例足月儿为EFM异常组。对照组为同期分娩胎心监护正常,按EFM异常组胎龄、体质量、分娩方式、Apgar分值及高危因素等配对的73例新生儿。观察2组不同Apgar评分新生儿脐动脉血气变化。结果 EFM异常组血气pH、碳酸氢根(HCO3-)、碱剩余(BE)较对照组显著降低(Pa<0.05,0.01)。EFM异常组1 min Apgar8~10分患儿血HCO3-、BE均较对照组降低(Pa<0.05)。EFM异常组Apgar 1~7分患儿血pH、HCO3-、BE较对照组降低(Pa<0.05,0.01)。EFM异常组Apgar 1~3分、4~7分、9~10分三者间血气pH、pa(CO2)、HCO3-、BE比较,差异有统计学意义(Pa<0.05,0.01);Apgar4~7分患儿血气pH、pa(CO2)、HCO3-、BE与Apgar 8分患儿一致,差异均无统计学意义(Pa>0.05);Apgar评分8分患儿血pH、HCO3-、BE均较Apgar9~10分患儿降低(Pa<0.05)。对照组不同Apgar评分组间血气比较,差异均无统计学意义(Pa>0.05)。结论胎心率持续减速对胎儿窘迫有预警作用;胎心率、Apgar评分及脐动脉血气3种方法组合应用,对准确评估围生儿窒息具有重要意义。
出处 《实用儿科临床杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第14期1074-1075,共2页 Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics
基金 深圳市科技计划项目(JA200505270370B)
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1王子莲,陈海天.重新认识和正确评价胎儿电子监护[J].中华围产医学杂志,2010,13(1):65-68. 被引量:20
  • 2American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106 :lntrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring:Nomenclature, interpretation and general management principles [ J ]. Obstet Gyrtecol, 2009,114(1 ) :192 -202.
  • 3金惠铭,王建枝.病理生理学[M].7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:118-120.
  • 4叶鸿瑁(译),虞人杰(校).2005美国新生儿复苏指南[J].中华围产医学杂志,2007,10(4):224-227. 被引量:6

二级参考文献22

  • 1Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, et al. Births: final data for 2002. Natl Vital Stat Rep,2003,52:1-113.
  • 2Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children' s Health. London (UK) : RCOG, 2007,9 : 154 -156.
  • 3American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpreta tion, and general management principles. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Obstet Gyneeol, 2009,114 : 192-202.
  • 4Maeones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, et al. The 2008 national Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol, 2008. 112:661-666.
  • 5Sherer DM, Dalloul M, Pierre N,et al. Intrapartum repetitive maternal heart rate deceleration pattern simulating nonre assuring fetal status. Am J Perinatol, 2005,22 : 165-167.
  • 6Martin A. Fetal heart rate during labour., definitions and interpretation. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), 2008,37(Suppl 1}:S34-S45.
  • 7Luttkus AK, Noren H, Stupin JH, et al. Fetal scalp pH and ST analysis of the fetal ECG as an adjunct to CTG. A multi center, observational study. J Peri Med,2004,32 : 486-494.
  • 8Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GML. Continuous eardiotoco graphy (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2006,3 :CD006066.
  • 9Nielsen PV, Stigsby B, Nickelsen C, et al. Intra- and interobserver variability in the assessment of intrapartum cardiotocograms. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 1987,66:421-424.
  • 10Beaulieu MD, Fabia J, Leduc B, et al. The reproducibility of intrapartum cardiotocogram assessments. Can Med Assoc J, 1982,127 : 214-216.

共引文献67

同被引文献92

引证文献11

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部