期刊文献+

中国股市非系统风险被定价的实证研究 被引量:14

An Empirical Study on the Pricing of Idiosyncratic Risk from Chinese Stock Market
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以Campbell模型为基础,建立预测回归方程,利用1995至2005年沪、深两市的数据,从宏观角度研究中国股票市场非系统风险对市场超额收益率的预测关系。实证结果表明,非系统风险对市场超额收益率具有显著的正预测能力;在控制流动性效应后,结果具有稳健性;非预期市场流动性对市场超额收益率具有显著的正效应,而系统风险和预期市场流动性对市场超额收益率没有预测能力。这些结果表明非系统风险被定价,同时也可以为中国股票市场机构投资者热衷集中持股现象做出理论解释。 Based on Campbell model,the prediction equation is built to examine the predictability of market excess return with idiosyncratic risk in Chinese stock market with the data from 1995 to 2005.A significant positive relation between idiosyncratic risk and market excess return is found.These relations persist after controlling for liquidity risk known to forecast the stock market.The evidence shows that idiosyncratic risk is priced.The positive effect of unexpected market liquidity on contemporaneous market excess return is also found,and expected market liquidity or systemic risk has no forecasting power for the market excess return.The evidence can be used to explain why institutional investors like to do concentration investment.
作者 陈健
出处 《南方经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第7期41-49,14,共10页 South China Journal of Economics
基金 上海市教育委员会科研创新项目(08YS78)的资助
关键词 非系统风险 市场超额收益率 预测 Idiosyncratic Risk Market Excess Return Predictability
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Ang,A.,R.Hodrick,Y.Xing and X.Zhang,2006,The cross-section of volatility and expected returns,The Journal of Finance,(61):259-299.
  • 2Ang,A.,R.Hodrick,Y.Xing and X.Zhang,2009,High idiosyncratic volatility and low returns:international and further U.S.evidence,Journal of Financial Economics,91(1):1-23.
  • 3Bali,T.G.and N.Cakici,2008,Idiosyncratic volatility and the cross-section of expected returns? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,(43):29-58.
  • 4Bali,T.G.,N.Cakici,X.Yan and Z.Zhang,2005,Does idiosyncratic risk really matter,The Journal of Finance,60(2):905-929.
  • 5Brockman,P.and M.Schutte,2007,Is idiosyncratic volatility priced? the international evidence,working paper,University of Missouri-Columbia.
  • 6Campbell,J.Y.,M.Lettau,B.G.Malkiel and Y.Xu,2001,Have individual stocks become more volatile? an empirical exploration of idiosyncratic risk,The Journal of Finance,(56):1-43.
  • 7Datar,T.V.,Y.N.Naik and R.Radcliffe,1998,Liquidity and stock returns:an alternative test,Journal of Financial Markets,(1):203-219.
  • 8Douglas,G.W.,1969,Risk in the equity markets,an empirical appraisal of market efficiency,Yale Economic Essays,(9):3-45.
  • 9Drew,M.E.,T.Naughton and M.Veeraraghavan,2005,Pricing of equities in China,evidence from the Shanghai Stock Exchange,Managerial Finance,(31):46-57.
  • 10Easley,D.,S.Hvidkjaer and M.O'Hara,2002,Is information risk a determinant of asset returns,The Journal of Finance,(57):2185-2221.

二级参考文献60

共引文献325

同被引文献232

引证文献14

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部