期刊文献+

TOPSIS with Belief Structure for Group Belief Multiple Criteria Decision Making 被引量:1

TOPSIS with Belief Structure for Group Belief Multiple Criteria Decision Making
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) is one of the major techniques in dealing with multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) problems, and the belief structure (BS) model has been used successfully for uncertain MCDM with incompleteness, impreciseness or ignorance. In this paper, the TOPSIS method with BS model is proposed to solve group belief MCDM problems. Firstly, the group belief MCDM problem is structured as a belief decision matrix in which the judgments of each decision maker are described as BS models, and then the evidential reasoning approach is used for aggregating the multiple decision makers' judgments. Subsequently, the positive and negative ideal belief solutions are defined with the principle of TOPSIS. To measure the separation from ideal solutions, the concept and algorithm of belief distance measure are defined, which can be used for comparing the difference between BS models. Finally, the relative closeness and ranking index are calculated for ranking the alternatives. A numerical example is given to illustrate the proposed method. The technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) is one of the major techniques in dealing with multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) problems, and the belief structure (BS) model has been used successfully for uncertain MCDM with incompleteness, impreciseness or ignorance. In this paper, the TOPSIS method with BS model is proposed to solve group belief MCDM problems. Firstly, the group belief MCDM problem is structured as a belief decision matrix in which the judgments of each decision maker are described as BS models, and then the evidential reasoning approach is used for aggregating the multiple decision makers' judgments. Subsequently, the positive and negative ideal belief solutions are defined with the principle of TOPSIS. To measure the separation from ideal solutions, the concept and algorithm of belief distance measure are defined, which can be used for comparing the difference between BS models. Finally, the relative closeness and ranking index are calculated for ranking the alternatives. A numerical example is given to illustrate the proposed method.
出处 《International Journal of Automation and computing》 EI 2010年第3期359-364,共6页 国际自动化与计算杂志(英文版)
基金 supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.70971131, 70901074)
关键词 Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) belief structure (BS) model group decision making belief distance measure. Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM), technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), belief structure (BS) model, group decision making, belief distance measure.
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1C.L.Hwang,K.Yoon.Multiple Attribute Decision Making,Springer-Verlag,Berlin,1981.
  • 2H.S.Shih,H.J.Shyur,E.S.Lee.An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making.Mathematical and Computer Modelling,vol.45,no.7,pp.801-813,2007.
  • 3C.T.Chen,C.T.Lin,S.F.Huang.A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management.International Journal of Production Economics,vol.102,no.2,pp.289-301,2006.
  • 4H.Deng,C.H.Yeh,R.J.Willis.Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights.Computers& Operations Research,vol.27,no.10,pp.963-973,2000.
  • 5M.F.Chen,G.H.Tzeng.Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country.Mathematical and Computer Modelling,vol.40,no.13,pp.1473-1490,2004.
  • 6Y.M.Wang,T.M.S.Elhag.Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment.Expert Systems with Applications,vol.31,no.2,pp.309-319,2006.
  • 7T.C.Chu.Facility location selection using fuzzy TOPSIS under group decisions.International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems,vol.10,no.6,pp.687-701,2002.
  • 8T.C.Chu,Y.C.Lin.A fuzzy TOPSIS method for robot selection.International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,vol.21,no.4,pp.284-290,2003.
  • 9S.Balli,S.Korukoglu.Operating system selection using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods.Mathematical & Computational Applications,vol.14,no.2,pp.119-130,2009.
  • 10T.C.Wang,H.D.Lee.Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights.Expert Systems with Applications,vol.36,no.5,pp.8980-8985,2009.

同被引文献28

  • 1FRANKE V. Decision making under uncertainty: Using case studies for teaching strategy in complex environments [J]. Journal of Military and Strategic Studies, 2011, 13(2): 1-21.
  • 2CHEN Xiao-hong, ZHOU Yan-ju, HU Dong-bin. A problem solving framework for group support system [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2002, 9(4): 7121-7131.
  • 3OBERKAMPF W L, HELTON J C, JOSLYN C. A. Challenge problems: Uncertainty in system response given uncertain parameters [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2012, 85(1): 9-11.
  • 4HELTON J C, OBERKAMPF W L. Alternative representations of epistemic uncertainty [J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2004, 85(1/3): 1-10.
  • 5YANG Jian-bo. Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 131(1): 31— 61.
  • 6YANG Jian-bo, LIU Jun, WANG Jin, SU How-sing, WANG Hong-wei. Belief rule-base inference methodology using the evidential reasoning approach-RIMER [J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2006, 36(2): 266-285.
  • 7YANG Ying-ming, YANG Jian-bo, XU Dong-ling. Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 174(3): 1885— 1913.
  • 8FU Chao, YANG Shan-lin. The combination of dependence-based interval-valued evidential reasoning approach with balanced scorecard for performance assessment [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39(3): 3717-3730.
  • 9ZHOU Zhi-jie, HU Chang-hua, YANG Jian-bo, XU Dong-ling, ZHOU Dong-hua. Online updating belief-rule-based systems for pipeline leak detection under expert intervention [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36 (4): 7700-7709.
  • 10TANG Da-wei, YANG Jian-bo, CHIN Kwai-sang, WONG Zoie S Y, LIU Xin-bao. A methodology to generate a belief rule base for customer perception risk analysis in new production development[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38 (5): 5373—5383.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部